四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义

doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2020.06.075

古地理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 1109-1126. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2020.06.075

• 岩相古地理学及沉积学 • 上一篇下一篇

四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义

胡笙¹, 谭秀成^{1, 2}, 罗冰³, 张本健⁴, 张亚³, 苏成鹏¹, 芦飞凡¹, 李明隆¹

1. 西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500;
2. 中国石油天然气集团有限公司碳酸盐岩储层重点实验室西南石油大学研究分室,四川成都 610500;
3. 中国石油西南油气田分公司勘探开发研究院,四川成都 610041;
4. 中国石油西南油气田分公司川西北气矿,四川江油 621700

收稿日期:2020-03-13 修回日期:2020-05-24 出版日期:2020-12-01 发布日期:2020-12-03
通讯作者: 谭秀成,男,1970年生,教授,博士生导师,主要从事碳酸盐岩沉积学与储集层地质学研究。E-mail: tanxiucheng70@163.com。
作者简介:胡笙,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事储集层地质学方面研究。E-mail: oldmoonsheng@163.com。
基金资助:
“十三五”国家科技重大专项(编号: 2016ZX05004002-001)资助;

Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and geological significance of the Permian Qixia Stage in northwestern Sichuan Basin

Hu Sheng¹, Tan Xiu-Cheng^{1, 2}, Luo Bing³, Zhang Ben-Jian⁴, Zhang Ya³, Su Cheng-Peng¹, Lu Fei-Fan¹, Li Ming-Long¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation,Chengdu 610500,China;
2. Division of Key Laboratory of Carbonate Reservoirs,CNPC,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China;
3. Exploration and Development Research Institute,PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company,Chengdu 610041,China;
4. Northwest Sichuan Gasfield,PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company,Sichuan Jiangyou 621700,China;

Received:2020-03-13 Revised:2020-05-24 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-12-03
Contact: Tan Xiu-Cheng,born in 1970,is a professor and Ph.D. advisor of Southwest Petroleum University. He is mainly engaged in the researches on carbonate sedimentology and reservoir geology. E-mail: tanxiucheng70@163.com.
About author:Hu Sheng,born in 1994,is a master degree candidate of Southwest Petroleum University. He is mainly engaged in the study of reservoir geology. E-mail: oldmoonsheng@163.com.
Supported by:
Financially supported by“Thirteen-five”National Science and Technology Major Project of China(No.2016ZX05004002-001)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于露头、钻井岩心和测录井资料,采用层序地层学理论与方法,将四川盆地西北部二叠系梁山组+栖霞组作为一个整体予以解剖,识别出梁山组底界面(Ⅰ型)、栖一段与栖二段界面(Ⅱ型)和栖霞组与茅口组界面(Ⅰ型)3个三级层序界面,将中二叠统栖霞阶划分为2个三级层序: 下部的SQ1层序对应梁山组+栖一段,上部的SQ2层序对应栖二段。通过栖霞阶层序地层格架分析,发现栖霞阶地层存在“底超顶削”的充填规律,统计并绘制SQ1与SQ2层序地层厚度等值线图,对研究区栖霞阶SQ1初期和SQ2期构造—古地理格局进行了恢复,在明确SQ2期为栖霞阶主要成滩期的基础上,结合岩溶发育单元及白云岩展布特征,讨论栖霞阶油气储集意义。结果表明:区内栖霞阶存在北西、北东向隆坳分异,汉南隆起、川北隆起、北缘隆起与广元—旺苍凹陷始终控制了区内沉积格局,指出广元—旺苍海槽雏形始于二叠系栖霞阶。研究区岩溶白云岩孔洞型储集层区与环广元—旺苍凹陷周缘的灰岩岩溶型储集层区为有利的勘探区。

关键词: 层序地层, 地层充填规律, 构造—, 古地理格局, 地质意义, 栖霞阶, 四川盆地

Abstract: Based on outcrops, drilling, cores, and logging data, the Liangshan Formation and Qixia Formation in the northwestern Sichuan region are analyzed using the theory and method of sequence stratigraphy. Three third-order sequence boundaries are identified, including the basal boundary of Liangshan Formation (type Ⅰ), the boundary between Qi 1 Member and Qi 2 Member (type Ⅱ), and the boundary between the Qixia Formation and the Maokou Formation (type Ⅰ). The Middle Permian Qixia Stage can be subdivided into two third-order sequences (from base to top: SQ1 and SQ2). The SQ1 sequence corresponds to the Liangshan Formation and the Qi 1 Member, and the SQ2 sequence corresponds to the Qi 2 Member. Based on the sequence stratigraphic framework reconstruction of the Qixia Stage, the sedimentary filling pattern of the “onlapping at the base and truncation at the top” is discovered. The contour maps of SQ1 and SQ2 sequence stratigraphic thickness are calculated and plotted. Combined with the stratigraphic filling pattern, the tectonic-palaeogeographical framework of the early SQ1 and SQ2 phases of the Qixia Stage, their geological significance is discussed. At the Qixia Stage, the differentiation between uplift and depression occurs in the northwest and northeast trends. The Hannan uplift, the northern Sichuan uplift, the northern margin uplift and the Guangyuan-Wangcang sag have controlled the sedimentary pattern in the study area. It is indicated that prototype of the Guangyuan-Wangcang Trough began in the Middle Permian Qixia Stage. In the study area, the karst cave-type dolostone reservoir and the karst-type limestone reservoir around the Guangyuan-Wangcang sag rim are favorable exploration areas.

Key words: sequence stratigraphy, sedimentary filling pattern, tectonic-palaeogeographic framework, geologic significance, Qixia Stage, northwestern Sichuan Basin

中图分类号:

P588.24+5

胡笙, 谭秀成, 罗冰, 张本健, 张亚, 苏成鹏, 芦飞凡, 李明隆. 四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(6): 1109-1126.

Hu Sheng, Tan Xiu-Cheng, Luo Bing, Zhang Ben-Jian, Zhang Ya, Su Cheng-Peng, Lu Fei-Fan, Li Ming-Long. Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and geological significance of the Permian Qixia Stage in northwestern Sichuan Basin[J]. JOPC, 2020, 22(6): 1109-1126.

http://www.gdlxb.cn/CN/Y2020/V22/I6/1109

参考文献

[1] 陈宗清. 2007. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气勘探. 中国石油勘探, 12(5): 1-11.
[Chen Z Q.2007. Exploration for natural gas in Middle Permian Maokou Formation of Sichuan Basin. China Petroleum Exploration, 12(5): 1-11]
[2] 范昱. 2011. 川东北地区下侏罗统自流井组层序地层及沉积充填特征研究. 成都理工大学硕士学位论文. [Fan Y. 2011. The Characteristics of Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Filling of Lower Jurassic Ziliujing Formation in the Northeast Area of Sichuan Basin. Masteral dissertation of Chengdu University of Technology]
[3] 关新,陈世加,苏旺,乐幸福,张浩然. 2018. 四川盆地西北部栖霞组碳酸盐岩储层特征及主控因素. 岩性油气藏, 30(2): 67-76.
[Guan X,Chen S J,Su W,Le X F,Zhang H R.2018. Carbonate reservoir characteristics and main controlling factors of Middle Permian Qixia Formation in NW Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 30(2): 67-76]
[4] 胡安平,潘立银,郝毅,沈安江,谷明峰. 2018. 四川盆地二叠系栖霞组、茅口组白云岩储层特征、成因和分布. 海相油气地质, 23(2): 39-52.
[Hu A P,Pan L Y,Hao Y,Shen A J,Gu M F.2018. Origin,characteristics and distribution of dolostone reservoir in Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation,Sichuan Basin,China. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 23(2): 39-52]
[5] 胡明毅,魏国齐,胡忠贵,杨威,胡九珍,刘满仓,吴联钱,向娟. 2010. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组层序: 岩相古地理. 古地理学报, 12(5): 515-526.
[Hu M Y,Wei G Q,Hu Z G,Yang W,Hu J Z,Liu M C,Wu L Q,Xiang J.2010. Sequence-lithofacies palaeogeography of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in Sichuan Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 12(5): 515-526]
[6] 黄涵宇,何登发,李英强,王贝. 2017. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪梁山—栖霞组沉积盆地原型及其演化. 岩石学报, 33(4): 1317-1337.
[Huang H Y,He D F,Li Y Q,Wang B.2017. The prototype and its evolution of the Sichuan sedimentary basin and adjacent areas during Liangshan and Qixia stages in Permian. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 33(4): 1317-1337]
[7] 金值民,谭秀成,唐浩,沈安江,乔占峰,郑剑锋,李飞,张世轩,陈雷,周成刚. 2020. 浅水超覆沉积富有机质细粒沉积物的岩石学证据: 以塔里木盆地西北部寒武系玉尔吐斯组为例. 石油勘探与开发, 47(3): 1-14.
[Jin Z M,Tan X C,Tang H,Shen A J,Qiao Z F,Zheng J F,Li F,Zhang S X,Chen L,Zhou C G.2020. Petrological evidence of organic-rich fine sediments from shallow water overlapping deposits: A case study of Cambrian Yuertus Formation in Tarim Basin,NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(3): 1-14]
[8] 黎荣,胡明毅,杨威,刘满仓. 2019. 四川盆地中二叠统沉积相模式及有利储集体分布. 石油与天然气地质, 40(2): 369-379.
[Li R,Hu M Y,Yang W,Liu M C.2019. Sedimentary facies model and favorable reservoir distribution of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 40(2): 369-379]
[9] 李晋僧,曹宣铎,杨家禄,殷鸿福,杨逢清,张瑞林,胡云绪,赖旭龙. 1994. 秦岭显生宙古海盆沉积和演化史. 北京: 地质出版社,1-216.
[Li J S,Cao X D,Yang J L,Yin H F,Yang F Q,Zhang R L,Hu Y X,Lai X L.1994. Sedimentary and Evolutionary History of the Paleozoic Paleo-ocean Basin in the Qinling Mountains. Beijing: Geological Publishing House,1-216]
[10] 梁宁,郑荣才,邓吉刚,蒋欢,郭春利,高志勇. 2016. 川西北地区中二叠统栖霞组沉积相与缓斜坡模式. 岩性油气藏, 28(6): 58-67.
[Liang N,Zheng R C,Deng J G,Jiang H,Guo C L,Gao Z Y.2016. Sedimentary facies and gentle slope model of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the northwestern Sichuan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 28(6): 58-67]
[11] 罗进雄,何幼斌,何明薇,陈晓辉. 2019. 华南中二叠统眼球状石灰岩特征及成因的思考. 古地理学报, 21(4): 613-626.
[Luo J X,He Y B,He M W,Chen X H.2019. Thoughts on characteristics and origin of the Middle Permian eyeball-shaped limestone in South China. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 21(4): 613-626]
[12] 罗兰. 2017. 川西北地区栖霞组—茅口组沉积相研究. 西南石油大学硕士学位论文. [Luo L. 2017. Study on Sedimentary Facies of Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation in Northwest Sichuan. Masteral dissertation of Southwest Petroleum University]
[13] 罗志立,金以钟,朱夔玉,赵锡奎. 1988. 试论上扬子地台的峨眉地裂运动. 地质论评, 34(1): 11-24.
[Luo Z L,Jin Y Z,Zhu K Y,Zhao X K.1988. On Emei taphrogenesis of the Upper Yangtze platform. Geological Review, 34(1): 11-24]
[14] 马永生,牟传龙,郭旭升,谭钦银,余谦. 2006. 四川盆地东北部长兴期沉积特征与沉积格局. 地质论评, 52(1): 25-29.
[Ma Y S,Mou C L,Guo X S,Tan Q Y,Yu Q.2006. Characteristic and framework of the Changxingian sedimentation in the northeastern Sichuan Basin. Geological Review, 52(1): 25-29]
[15] 马永生,陈洪德,王国力. 2009. 中国南方层序地层与古地理. 北京: 科学出版社,210-212.
[Ma Y S,Chen H D,Wang G L.2009. Sequence Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography in South China. Beijing: Science Press,210-212]
[16] 宋文海. 1987. 对四川盆地加里东期古隆起的新认识. 天然气工业, 7(3): 6-11.
[Song W H.1987. Some new knowledge of Caledonian Paleo-uplift in Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 7(3): 6-11]
[17] 苏成鹏. 2017. 川东地区茅口组眼球状石灰岩成因机制及地质意义. 西南石油大学硕士论文. [Su C P. 2017. Genetic Mechanism and Geological Significance of Eye-shaped Limestone in Maokou Formation in Eastern Sichuan. Masteral dissertation of Southwest Petroleum University]
[18] 苏旺,陈志勇,汪泽成,江青春,张宝民,单秀琴,姜华,卞丛胜. 2016. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组沉积特征. 东北石油大学学报, 40(3): 41-50.
[Su W,Chen Z Y,Wang Z C,Jiang Q C,Zhang B M,Shan X Q,Jiang H,Bian C S.2016. Sedimentary characteristics of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the western Sichuan area. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 40(3): 41-50]
[19] 谭秀成,聂勇,刘宏,周彦,李凌,赵路子,张本健,冯钰. 2011. 陆表海碳酸盐岩台地沉积期微地貌恢复方法研究: 以四川盆地磨溪气田嘉二~2亚段A层为例. 沉积学报, 29(3): 486-494.
[Tan X C,Nie Y,Liu H,Zhou Y,Li L,Zhao L Z,Zhang B J,Feng Y.2011. Research on the method of recoverying microtopography of epeiric Carbonate Platform in depositional stage: A case study from the layer A of Jia 22 Member in Moxi Gas Field,Sichuan Basin. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 29(3): 486-494]
[20] 谭秀成,肖笛,陈景山,李凌,刘宏. 2015. 早成岩期喀斯特化研究新进展及意义. 古地理学报, 17(4): 441-456.
[Tan X C,Xiao D,Chen J S,Li L,Liu H.2015. New advance and enlightenment of eogenetic karstification. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 17(4): 441-456]
[21] 唐大海,肖笛,谭秀成,李海云,谢继容,刘宏,杨迅,张本健. 2016. 古岩溶地貌恢复及地质意义: 以川西北中二叠统茅口组为例. 石油勘探与开发, 43(5): 689-695.
[Tang D H,Xiao D,Tan X C,Li Y H,Xie J R,Liu H,Yang X,Zhang B J.2016. Restoration of paleokarst landform and its geological significance: A case from Middle Permian Maokou Formation in northwestern Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 43(5): 689-695]
[22] 田景春,林小兵,张翔,彭顺风,杨辰雨,罗寿兵,徐亮. 2014. 四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组滩相白云岩多重成因机理及叠加效应. 岩石学报, 30(3): 679-686.
[Tian J C,Lin X B,Zhang X,Peng S F,Yang C Y,Luo S B,Xu L.2014. The genetic mechanism of shoal facies dolomite and its additive effect of Permian Qixia Formation in Sichuan Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(3): 679-686]
[23] 王成善,陈洪德,寿建峰,李祥辉,田景春,覃建雄. 1999. 中国南方二叠纪层序地层划分与对比. 沉积学报, 17(4): 499-509.
[Wang C S,Chen H D,Shou J F,Li X H,Tan J X,Qin J C.1999. Characteristics and correlation of Permian depositional sequences in South China. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 17(4): 499-509]
[24] 王海真,池英柳,赵宗举,江青春,鲁卫华. 2013. 四川盆地栖霞组岩溶储层及勘探选区. 石油学报, 34(5): 833-842.
[Wang H Z,Chi Y L,Zhao Z J,Jiang Q C,Lu W H.2013. Karst reservoirs developed in the Middle Permian Qixia Formation of Sichuan Basin and selection of exploration regions. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 34(5): 833-842]
[25] 魏国齐,杨威,朱永刚,金惠,李跃纲,施振生,沈珏红. 2010. 川西地区中二叠统栖霞组沉积体系. 石油与天然气地质, 31(4): 442-448.
[Wei G Q,Yang W,Zhu Y G,Jin H,Li Y G,Shi Z S,Shen Y H.2010. Depositional system of the Middle Permian Qixia Formation in the western Sichuan Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 31(4): 442-448]
[26] 魏国齐,杨威,万怡平,金惠. 2011. 扬子地块西北缘二叠系—中三叠统层序地层与沉积相展布. 岩石学报, 27(3): 741-748.
[Wei G Q,Yang W,Wan Y P,Jin H.2011. Stratigraphic sequence and sedimentary facies distribution of the Permian Middle Triassic in the northwestern margin of the Yangtze Block. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(3): 741-748]
[27] 吴联钱,胡明毅,胡忠贵,向娟. 2010. 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层学研究. 石油地质与工程, 24(6): 10-13,139.
[Wu L Q,Hu M Y,Hu Z G,Xiang J.2010. Study on the middle Permian sequence stratigraphy of Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 24(6): 10-13,139]
[28] 武重阳,于炳松,王红军,阮壮,程传捷,郭同翠,张良杰,程木伟. 2018. 阿姆河右岸B区中部卡洛夫—牛津阶高精度层序地层划分及层序发育模式. 现代地质, 32(5): 924-937.
[Wu C Y,Yu B S,Wang H J,Ruan Z,Cheng C J,Guo T C,Zhang L J,Cheng M W.2018. High-resolution stratigraphic division and formation model of the Callovian-Oxfordian sequences in the central part of Block B in the right bank of Amu Darya Basin,Turkmenistan. Geoscience, 32(5): 924-937]
[29] 杨光,汪华,沈浩,杨雨然,贾松,陈文,朱华,李毅. 2015. 四川盆地中二叠统储层特征与勘探方向. 天然气工业, 35(7): 10-16.
[Yang G,Wang H,Shen H,Yang Y R,Jia S,Chen W,Zhu H,Li Y.2015. Characteristics and exploration prospects of Middle Permian reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 35(7): 10-16]
[30] 杨跃明,陈聪,文龙,陈骁,粱瀚,刘冉,关旭,罗冰,谢忱. 2018. 四川盆地龙门山北段隐伏构造带特征及其油气勘探意义. 天然气工业, 38(8): 8-15.
[Yang Y M,Chen C,Wen L,Chen X,Liang H,Liu R,Guan X,Luo B,Xie C.2018. Characteristics of buried structures in the northern longmenshan mountains and its significance to oil and gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 38(8): 8-15]
[31] 曾德铭,石新,王兴志,黄勇,杨跃明. 2010. 川西北地区下二叠统栖霞组滩相储层特征及其分布. 天然气工业, 30(12): 25-28.
[Zeng D M,Shi X,Wang X Z,Huang Y,Yang Y M.2010. Features and distribution of shoal facies reservoirs in the Lower Permian Qixia Formation,northwest Sichuan Basin. Natural Gas Industry, 30(12): 25-28]
[32] 张本健. 2019. 川西北部地区中二叠统栖霞组砂糖状白云岩储层特征及成因机制. 西南石油大学博士学位论文. [Zhang B J. 2019. Reservoir Characteristics and Origin Mechanism of Saccharoidal Dolomite of Qixia Formation in the Middle Permian of the Northwest Sichuan. Doctoral dissertation of Southwest Petroleum University]
[33] 张本健,王兴志,王宇峰,胡欣,裴森奇,范存辉. 2019. 川西北九龙山地区中二叠统储层裂缝特征及形成机制. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 46(4): 497-506.
[Zhang B J,Wang X Z,Wang Y F,Hu X,Pei S Q,Fan C H.2019. Occurrence characteristics and formation mechanism of fractures in Middle Permian reservoirs in Jiulongshan area,Sichuan Basin,China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 46(4): 497-506]
[34] 张运波. 2011. 四川盆地中二叠统层序地层及沉积模式. 中国地质大学(北京)硕士学位论文. [Zhang Y B. 2011. Sequence Stratigraphy and Depositional Models of the Middle Permian in Sichuan Basin. Masteral dissertation of China University of Geosciences(Beijing)]
[35] 张运周. 2018. 川西北中二叠统栖霞组沉积体系特征. 成都理工大学博士学位论文. [Zhang Y Z. 2018. Sedimentary System Characteristics of the Qixia Formation in the Middle Permian in Northwest Sichuan. Doctoral dissertation of Chengdu University of Technology]
[36] 赵宗举,周慧,陈轩,刘银河,张运波,刘玉娥,杨雨. 2012. 四川盆地及邻区二叠纪层序岩相古地理及有利勘探区带. 石油学报,33(S2): 35-51.
[Zhao Z J,Zhou H,Chen X,Liu Y H,Zhang Y B,Liu Y E,Yang Y.2012. Sequence lithofacies paleogeography and favorable exploration zones of the Permian in Sichuan Basin and adjacent areas,China. Acta Petrolei Sinica,33(S2): 35-51]
[37] 郑超,王宇峰,汤兴宇,胡欣,孙志昀. 2018. 双鱼石地区栖霞组层序地层划分及沉积相分析. 特种油气藏, 25(4): 39-45.
[Zheng C,Wang Y F,Tang X Y,Hu X,Sun Z Y.2018. Sequence stratigraphic division and sedimentary facies analysis of Qixia Formation in the Shuangyushi Block. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 25(4): 39-45]
[38] 周进高,郝毅,邓红婴,谷明峰,潘立银,姚倩颖,杨雨然,娄雪. 2019. 四川盆地中西部栖霞组—茅口组孔洞型白云岩储层成因与分布. 海相油气地质, 24(4): 67-78.
[Zhou J G,Hao Y,Deng H Y,Gu M F,Pan L Y,Yao Q Y,Yang Y R,Lou X.2019. Genesis and distribution of vuggy dolomite reservoirs of the Lower Permian Qixia Formation and Maokou Formation,western-central Sichuan Basin. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 24(4): 67-78]
[39] Su C P,Li F,Tan X C,Gong Q L,Zeng K,Tang H,Li M L,Wang X F.2020. Recognition of diagenetic contribution to the formation of limestone-marl alternations: A case study from Permian of South China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 111: 765-785.
[40] Xiao D,Zhang B J,Tan X C,Liu H,Xie J R,Wang L C,Yang X,Ma T.2018. Discovery of a shoal-controlled karst dolomite reservoir in the Middle Permian Qixia Formation,northwestern Sichuan Basin,Southwest China. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 36(4): 686-704.
[41] Wang Y,Jin Y G.2000. Permian palaeogeographic evolution of the Jiangnan Basin,South China. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, 160(1-2): 35-44.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义

Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and geological significance of the Permian Qixia Stage in northwestern Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邵龙义, 王浪浪, 连豪杰, 朱红涛, 朱筱敏. 陆相层序地层构型与沉积模拟研究现状及进展^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(1): 1-15.
[2]	尚俊鑫, 冯明友, 夏茂龙, 张本健, 王兴志, 贾松, 李勇, 曾乙洋, 韦明洋. 川北震旦系灯影组软沉积物变形构造及成因分析[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(1): 72-84.
[3]	刘凯铭, 王兴志, 韦明洋, 李阳, 陈旺, 王文之, 李勇, 马奎. 四川盆地蓬莱地区灯影组四段超深层白云岩储集层特征及主控因素^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(1): 109-125.
[4]	金惠, 崔俊峰, 杨桂茹, 杨威, 肖佃师, 王志宏, 王民, 武雪琼, 薄冬梅. 川中—川西须家河组三段致密砂岩储集层分类及成因^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(6): 1452-1466.
[5]	高梦天, 尤丽, 胡高伟, 龚宇, 李彦丽, 陈亚兵, 冯琦, 韩骏威, 刘国麟. 南海北缘陆相断陷盆地优质烃源岩发育机制:以珠江口盆地顺德凹陷始新统文昌组为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(5): 1108-1126.
[6]	匡明志, 张小兵, 袁海锋, 陈聪, 张玺华, 彭瀚霖, 徐婷, 肖钦仁, 李天军, 山述娇. 川中地区茅口组碳酸盐岩层序地层及沉积相特征^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(5): 1201-1220.
[7]	曾建军, 谭秀成, 赵东方, 何如意, 罗文军, 刘耘, 徐伟, 李绍瑞, 邓禹, 吴昊. 川中高石1井区灯影组二段早成岩期岩溶特征及其对储集层的影响^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(5): 1221-1234.
[8]	李滢, 李飞, 鲁子野, 李杨凡, 王曾俊, 李雅兰, 谢慧, 张天舒. 汉南—米仓山地区东部寒武系仙女洞组斑块白云岩特征及形成机制^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(5): 1235-1255.
[9]	刘明成, 吴胜和, 万晓龙, 李桢, 樊建民, 陈朝晖, 王梓沣, 刘海旭. 鄂尔多斯盆地庆城油田延长组页岩层系层序地层与沉积相特征^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(4): 779-795.
[10]	陈宏逵, 朱筱敏, 肖坤叶, 杜业波, 袁志云, 张新顺, 王晓雪. 乍得Doseo盆地东部坳陷下白垩统Kedeni组层序地层格架与沉积体系分布^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(4): 796-815.
[11]	时志强, 彭深远, 赵子腾. 上奥陶统五峰组海底麻坑沉积的首次识别及其地质意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(2): 255-268.
[12]	李新坡, 郑秀娟, 朱筱敏, 鲍志东, 王媛, 鲜本忠. “古地理学术论坛”第1—17期评述[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(2): 502-508.
[13]	陈烨菲, 赵伦, 侯珏, 李毅, 王淑琴, 李建新. 滨里海盆地东缘北特鲁瓦油田石炭系层序地层与沉积演化特征^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(1): 58-74.
[14]	田子晗, 索艳慧, 李三忠, 丁雪松, 韩续, 宋双双, 付新建. 长江三峡贯通过程的动态古地貌重建^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(1): 208-229.
[15]	陈明思, 张本健, 李智武, 刘树根, 李勇, 宋金民, 王瀚, 蒋航, 王林康, 徐少立, 丁一. 四川盆地及周缘震旦系灯影组岩性—碳同位素地层划分及意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(6): 1347-1363.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

四川盆地西北部二叠系栖霞阶层序地层特征及地质意义

Sequence stratigraphic characteristics and geological significance of the Permian Qixia Stage in northwestern Sichuan Basin

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价