河南东濮凹陷古近系各组段的原始地层厚度分布及其构造古地理意义

古地理学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 407-414.

• 构造古地理学及古构造 • 上一篇下一篇

河南东濮凹陷古近系各组段的原始地层厚度分布及其构造古地理意义

杨桥¹, 漆家福¹, 程秀申², 能源¹, 谢宸², 徐政强²

1 中国石油大学(北京)教育部油气成藏机理实验室,北京 102249;
2 中国石化中原油田石油勘探开发研究院,河南濮阳 451000

收稿日期:2006-03-20 修回日期:2006-04-10 出版日期:2006-06-01 发布日期:2006-06-01
作者简介:杨桥,女,现为中国石油大学(北京)资源与信息学院副教授,主要从事盆地沉降史分析和油区构造解析方面的研究及与地球科学相关的教学工作。

Distribution of original stratigraphic thickness of each member in the Paleogene and its tectonopalaeogeographic implication in Dongpu Sag, Henan Province

Qi Jiafu¹, Yang Qiao¹, Cheng Xiushen², Neng Yuan¹, Xie Chen², Xu Zhengqiang²

1 China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249;
2 Geological Institute of Exploration and Development, Zhongyuan Oilfield, SINOPEC, Puyang 457000, Henan

Received:2006-03-20 Revised:2006-04-10 Online:2006-06-01 Published:2006-06-01
About author:Yang Qiao is an associate professor of School of Resources and Information, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) , and is mainly engaged in research of basin subsiding history and tectonic analysis of petroliferous areas.第一作者简介杨桥,女,现为中国石油大学(北京)资源与信息学院副教授,主要从事盆地沉降史分析和油区构造解析方面的研究及与地球科学相关的教学工作。

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 东濮凹陷位于河南省濮阳市东部,属中原油田。古近系自下而上包括沙河街组一至四段和东营组。古近系原始地层厚度分布反映出东濮凹陷在古近纪具有裂陷盆地的构造古地理特点,但是古近纪不同时期裂陷盆地的特征有明显的差异。沙四段沉积时期发育多沉降—沉积中心的断陷湖盆,且沉积中心不稳定; 沙三段沉积时期兰聊断层是控制东濮凹陷的主边界断层,发育由2条相对稳定的NNE 向沉降一沉积带构成的复式半地堑断陷湖盆,控凹断层位移沿走向的差异导致局部沉降一沉积中心在次级凹陷带内沿轴向迁移; 沙二段、沙一段和东营组沉积时期东濮凹陷发育“反S型”沉降一沉积带,反映兰聊断层南段的垂直位移明显小于中段,而盆地南部的长垣断层与黄河断层的垂直位移量明显增大。古近纪构造古地理演化特征可能是导致断陷湖盆发育的岩石圈动力学机制变化的结果。

关键词: 河南省, 东濮凹陷, 古近系, 去压实校正, 原始地层厚度, 构造古地理

Abstract: The Dongpu Sag is located in eastern Puyang County, Henan Province, i. e. in the southern Linging Depression of the Bohai Bay Basin. The Paleogene consists of members 1 to 4 of Shahejie Formation and the Dongying Formation. The distribution of original stratigraphic thicknesses shows that the Dongpu Sag was a rifted basin in the Paleogene, while the characteristics of different periods were obviously different. During the deposition of Member 4 of Shahejie Formation, a rifted basin with multi subsiding depocenters was developed and its depocenters were not fixed. During the deposition of Member 3 of Shahejie Formation, the Lanliao fault was the main boundary fault controling the Dongpu Sag. A rifted lake basin constructed by complex half graben was developed and it was characterized by two NNE subsiding depositional belts. The differential throw of the fault controlling the sag along the strike direction caused the migration of local subsiding depocenters along the axis in the subsag. During the deposition of members 2 and 1 of Shahejie Formation and Dongying Formation, an anti-S shaped subsiding depoaxis was developed in the Dongpu Sag, which reflects that the vertical displacement in the southern Lanliao fault is obviously smaller than in its middle segment, and the throwments of the Changyuan and Huanghe faults in the southern basin apparently increased. The tectonopalaeogeography in the Paleogene probably resulted from the change of lithospheric dynamic mechanism which led to the development of the rifted basin.

Key words: Henan Province, Dongpu Sag, Paleogene, decompaction correction, original stratigraphic thickness, tectonopalaeogeography

中图分类号:

P53461+1

杨桥, 漆家福, 程秀申, 能源, 谢宸, 徐政强. 河南东濮凹陷古近系各组段的原始地层厚度分布及其构造古地理意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2006, 8(3): 407-414.

Qi Jiafu, Yang Qiao, Cheng Xiushen, Neng Yuan, Xie Chen, Xu Zhengqiang. Distribution of original stratigraphic thickness of each member in the Paleogene and its tectonopalaeogeographic implication in Dongpu Sag, Henan Province[J]. JOPC, 2006, 8(3): 407-414.

/ / 推荐 / 导出引用

链接本文: http://www.gdlxb.cn/CN/Y2006/V8/I3/407

参考文献

谷维成,赵其磊,吕迎红,等,2005,河南省濮阳地区古近系沙河街组盐岩层与油气藏的关系[J]. 古地理学报,7(4):87-93.
纪友亮,冯建辉,王声朗,等.2005,东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组沙三段沉积期湖岸线的变化及岩相古地理特征[J]. 古地理学报,7(2): 3-14.
林又玲,吴贤涛,潘结南,等.2000.东濮凹陷老第三系沙河街组盐类沉积模式新见[J]. 古地理学报,2(4):65-75.
漆家福,杨桥,王子煜.2003.编制盆地复原古构造图的若干问题的讨论[J].地质科学,38(3):413-424.
漆家福. 2004.渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释[J].中国地质,31(1):15-22.
佟彦明,宋立军,曾少军,等,2005.利用镜质体反射率恢复地层剥蚀厚度的新方法[J].古地理学报,7(3):417-423.
武风良. 1989.应用测井地震资料进行压实校正的方法[J].石油地球物理勘探,24(1):68-79.
吴智勇,郭建华,吴东胜,等.2000.东濮凹陷西洼南段老第三系岩相古地理特征[J].古地理学报,2(1):43-48.
胥菊珍,蒋飞虎,张孝义,等.2003.河南东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组盐岩沉积特征及成因[J].古地理学报,5(2):162-170.
杨桥,漆家福.2003.碎屑岩层的分层去压实校正方法[J].石油实验地质,25(2):206-210
Allen P A, Allen J R.1990.Basin Analysis, Principle and Application[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication.
Gerhard Einsele.1992, Sedimentary Basins[M].Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,311-344.
Gradstein F M, Agterberg F P, Brower J C,et al.1985. Quantitative Stratigraphy[M]. Reidel, Dordrecht, 558 .
GuidishT M, Kendall C G, Lerche S C,et al .1985. Basin evaluation using burial history calculation: An overview[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 69: 92-105.
Gu Weicheng, Zhao Qilei, Yinghong,et al.2005. Relationship between salt beds and oil and gas reservoir of the Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in Puyang area, Henan Province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,7(4):87-93 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Hegarty K A, WeisselJ K, MutterJ C.1988.Subsidence history of Australia's southern margin[J]. AAPG Bulletin,72:615-635.
Ji Youliang,Feng Jianhui, Wang Shenglang,et al.2005. Shifting of shorline and lithofacies paleogeographic characteristics during sedimentary period of the Member 3 of Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in Dongpu Sag[J]. Joumal of Palaeogeography,7(2):3-14 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Lin Youling, Wu Xiantao, Pan Jienan,et al.Salt depositional model of the Shahejie Formation of the Paleogene in Dongpu Depression[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2(4):66-75 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Perrier R,Quilbier J.1974. Thickness changes in sedimentary layers during compaction history[J]. AAPG Bulletin,58:507-520.
Qi Jiafu, Yang Qiao, Wang Ziyu.2003. Some problems about compiling a restored paleo-stractural maf of basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology.38(3):413-424 in Chinese with English abstract).
QiJiafu.2004.Two tectonic systems in the Cenozoic Bohai Bay basin and their genetic interpretation[J]. Chinese Geology,31(1):15-22(in Chinese with English abstract).
Tong Yanming,Song Lijun,Zeng Shacjun,et al.2005. A new method by vitrinite reflectance to estimate thickness of eroded strata[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,7(3):417-423 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Wu Fengliang.1989. The method of decompaction using log and seismic data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting,24(1):68-79(in Chinese with English abstract).
Wu Zhiyong,Guo Jianhua, Wu Dongsheng,et al.2002.Lithofacies paleogeography of Paleogen in Southern west sag of Dongpu Depression[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,2(1):43-48 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Xu Juzhen,Jiang Feihu,Zhang Xiaoyi,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and origin of salf rock of Shahejie Formation of Paleogene in Dongpu Sag, Henan Province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography,5(2):162-170 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Yang Qiao, Qi Jiafu.2003, Method of delaminated decompaction correction[J]. Experimental Petroleum Geology,25 (2):206-210 (n Chinese with English abstract).

[1]	海晴, 梁超, 杨博, 韩豫, 韩婉璐. 古盐度对陆相页岩发育的控制作用:以东营凹陷古近系沙三下页岩为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(5): 1140-1151.
[2]	许鹏, 连豪杰, 毕力格, 胡贺伟, 郜政辉, 姜福杰, 邵龙义. 渤海湾盆地埕北凹陷古近系沉积体系及砂体成因类型^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(4): 834-845.
[3]	甄宇, 陈旋, 焦立新, 李新宁, 周志超, 刘文辉, 殷树铮, 李涤, 苟红光, 李成明, 何登发. 东疆地区石炭纪—二叠纪构造古地理与原型盆地演化^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(1): 78-99.
[4]	张自力, 李琦, 朱筱敏, 谈明轩, 张锐锋, 曹兰柱, 李凤勋, 单帅强. 陆相断陷湖盆重力流湖底扇沉积与地震响应特征分析: 以渤海湾盆地霸县凹陷古近系沙河街组为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(5): 1049-1068.
[5]	方维萱. 论热水沉积岩相及其构造古地理^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(3): 525-553.
[6]	纪友亮, 任红燕, 张世奇, 马铮涛, 牛嘉玉, 郭姗姗, 高晨曦, 刘笑语. 渤海湾盆地古近纪古地理特征与油气^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(4): 611-633.
[7]	周靖皓, 鲜本忠, 张建国, 钟骑, 陈鹏. 高频旋回地层约束下的湖相页岩有机质富集规律: 以东营凹陷古近系沙三下亚段为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(4): 759-770.
[8]	陆鹿, 陈树光, 李壮福, 秦勇, 屈争辉, 沈玉林. 河套盆地临河坳陷白垩纪—古近纪沉积环境演化及油气地质意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(2): 308-331.
[9]	吴哲, 张丽丽, 朱伟林, 邵磊, 杨学奇. 南海北部白垩纪—渐新世早期沉积环境演变及构造控制^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(1): 73-84.
[10]	邢智峰, 付玉鑫, 郑伟, 李妲, 李素萍, 刘云龙, 齐永安, 李婉颖, 许欣, 吴盼盼, 张湘赟. 豫西宜阳上二叠统孙家沟组孢粉组合及其地质意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(5): 901-918.
[11]	陈国松, 孟元林, 郇金来, 戴天骄, 肖丽华, 周武. 自生绿泥石对储集层质量影响的定量评价:以北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷涠洲组三段为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(3): 639-650.
[12]	张洪安, 王长征, 蒋飞虎, 靳亚勤, 胡斌. 河南东濮凹陷古近系沙三中亚段重力流沉积与伴生遗迹化石组合[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(6): 1157-1170.
[13]	张自力, 朱筱敏, 李琦, 张锐锋, 耿荣燕, 曹兰柱, 施瑞生. 断陷湖盆差异湖侵过程与层序格架下沉积体系特征响应: 以霸县凹陷古近系沙河街组为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(3): 440-456.
[14]	胡贺伟, 李慧勇, 于海波, 肖述光, 徐伟. 渤海湾盆地埕北低凸起及围区古近系“源-汇”系统控砂原理定量分析^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(2): 266-277.
[15]	何登发, 李德生, 王成善, 刘少峰, 陈槚俊. 活动论构造古地理的研究现状、思路与方法^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(1): 1-28.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

河南东濮凹陷古近系各组段的原始地层厚度分布及其构造古地理意义

Distribution of original stratigraphic thickness of each member in the Paleogene and its tectonopalaeogeographic implication in Dongpu Sag, Henan Province

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

河南东濮凹陷古近系各组段的原始地层厚度分布及其构造古地理意义

Distribution of original stratigraphic thickness of each member in the Paleogene and its tectonopalaeogeographic implication in Dongpu Sag, Henan Province

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价