华南腹地茶永盆地白垩系古沙漠床沙构型定量重建与启示<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>

doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2024.06.081

古地理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 1372-1395. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2024.06.081

• 岩相古地理学及沉积学 • 上一篇下一篇

华南腹地茶永盆地白垩系古沙漠床沙构型定量重建与启示^*

黄乐清^1,2,3, 胡能勇⁴, 文春华¹, 孟繁星⁵, 陈旭¹, 向轲¹, 曾广乾¹, 焦鹏¹, 王灵珏¹

1 湖南省地质调查所,湖南长沙 410116;
2 中国地质大学(武汉)地质调查研究院,湖北武汉 430074;
3 古生物与地质环境演化湖北省重点实验室,湖北武汉 430205;
4 湖南省自然资源事务中心,湖南长沙 410004;
5 湖南省核地质调查所,湖南长沙 410007

收稿日期:2024-04-12 修回日期:2024-05-20 出版日期:2024-12-01 发布日期:2024-11-25
通讯作者: 文春华,男,1982年生,教授级高级工程师,主要从事区域地质及矿产研究。E-mail: herowch2004@163.com。
作者简介:黄乐清,男,1985年生,高级工程师,主要从事区域地质矿产与白垩纪风成沉积研究。E-mail: 289773254@qq.com。
基金资助:
*湖南省自然科学基金项目(编号: 2021JJ30388)、中国地质调查局古生物与地质环境演化湖北省重点实验室开放基金(编号: PEL-202203)、湖南省地质院科研项目(编号: HNGSTP202322)和湖南省创新型省份科普专题(编号: 2022ZK4207)共同资助

Quantitative reconstruction and implications of the Cretaceous Aeolian bedform architecture in Chayong Basin,the hinterland of South China

HUANG Leqing^1,2,3, HU Nengyong⁴, WEN Chunhua¹, MENG Fanxing⁵, CHEN Xu¹, XIANG Ke¹, ZENG Guangqian¹, JIAO Peng¹, WANG Lingjue¹

1 Geological Survey Institute of Hunan Province,Changsha 410116,China;
2 Institute of Geological Survey,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,China;
3 Hubei Key Laboratory of Paleontology and Geological Environment Evolution,Wuhan 430205,China;
4 Hunan Center of Natural Resources Affairs,Changsha 410004,China;
5 Nuclear Geological Survey Institute of Hunan Province,Changsha 410007,China

Received:2024-04-12 Revised:2024-05-20 Online:2024-12-01 Published:2024-11-25
Contact: WEN Chunhua,professor-level senior engineer,is mainly engaged in regional geological and mineral research. E-mail: herowch2004@163.com.
About author:About the first author HUANG Leqing,born in 1985,senior engineer,is mainly engaged in researches on regional geology,mineral resources,and Cretaceous aeolian sedimentary geology. E-mail: 289773254@qq.com.
Supported by:
Co-funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China(No.2021JJ30388),and Open Foundation of Hubei Key Laboratory of Paleontology and Geological Environment Evolution(No. PEL-202203),and scientific research program of Geological Bureau of Hunan Province(No. HNGSTP202322),and Hunan Province Innovative Province Science Popularization Special Topic(No.2022ZK4207)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 华南腹地茶永盆地白垩系发育古沙漠沉积,其沙丘构型特征多样,是构造活动、地下水文条件和古气候演变等多因素的综合结果,然而目前在该方面的研究却近乎空白,制约了对华南腹地古沙漠环境演变规律的认识。本研究将粒度端元分析(EMMA)新方法和沙丘构型分析传统方法相结合,开展古沙漠形态学研究及床沙构型定量重建工作。结果表明,华南腹地茶永盆地白垩纪沙漠沙丘规模较大,各项沙丘形态参数均远超全球典型断陷盆地的古沙丘均值,可以类比鄂尔多斯盆地白垩系古沙丘或塔克拉玛干沙漠的现代沙丘,指示茶永盆地的初始状态可能为一个大型干旱或沙漠盆地; 通过粒度端元四组分识别出风成沙丘、沙席和潮湿丘间(泥滩)等沉积环境类型。基于沙丘构型重建,恢复古风向为N-NE向,受北半球西风带控制,且该沉积构型记录了复合新月形沙丘、复杂(爬升)横向沙丘等多种形态类型。茶永盆地南部风成序列为干燥—潮湿型丘间风成体系,表现为内部干旱—潮湿丘间沉积与小—中型新月形沙丘的叠置; 盆地北部风成序列发育干燥型丘间风成体系,发育巨型(爬升)叠加复合沙丘。茶永盆地周缘地区的构造隆升与水系发育,为盆地带来大量沉积物源,并在风力作用下发生二次侵蚀、迁移和堆积; 断—拗陷盆地基底下沉、潜水面的升降,为风成沉积物的累积和保存创造了可容纳空间。该研究从风成沉积地质记录分析出发,提出了茶永盆地白垩纪沙漠沙丘规模可能较大的新见解,加深了对华南腹地风成/水成沉积—盆地构造—古气候等多要素耦合过程的理解。

关键词: 沙漠, 床沙构型, 白垩系, 茶永盆地, 华南

Abstract: The Cretaceous strata in the Chayong Basin,located in the hinterland of South China,are characterized by ancient desert sediments with diverse dune morphology. These features reflect a complex interplay of tectonic activity,hydrological conditions,and palaeoclimatic changes. Despite their significance,research on this topic remains limited,hindering our understanding of the evolution of the paleodesert environment. This study employs the innovative End-Member Modeling by Grain Size Analysis(EMMA)with traditional dune morphology analysis to investigate paleoaeolian morphologies and quantitatively reconstruct bedform configurations. The results indicate that the Cretaceous dunes in the Chayong Basin are exceptionally large,with morphological parameters surpassing global averages for typical fault basins. This suggests an initial arid or desert basin state comparable to the Cretaceous dunes of the Ordos Basin's or the modern dunes of the Taklamagan Desert. EMMA identified four end-members that are indicative of aeolian dunes,sand sheets,and moist interdune areas. The reconstructed paleowind direction was predominantly north-northeast,influenced by the westerlies of the Northern Hemisphere. The sedimentary configurations exhibit a variety of forms,including compound crescentic and complex transverse dunes. The southern part of the basin is characterized by a dry-moist interdune system,presenting internal arid-moist interdunes and small-medium crescentic dunes. In contrast,the northern part develops a dry interdune aeolian system dominated by giant compound dunes. Tectonic uplift and fluvial development surrounding the basin have provided abundant sediment sources,resulting in secondary erosion,migration,and deposition driven by wind action. The subsidence of the fault-basin basement and fluctuations in the groundwater table,has created accommodation space for the accumulation and preservation of aeolian sediments. This study,based on aeolian sedimentary geological records,offers a new perspective on the large-scale dynamics of the Chayong Basin during the Cretaceous period,enhancing our comprehension of the coupled processes of aeolian/fluvial sedimentation,basin tectonics,and paleoclimatic evolution in the hinterland of South China.

Key words: desert, bedform architecture, Cretaceous, Chayong Basin, South China

中图分类号:

P512.2+1

黄乐清, 胡能勇, 文春华, 孟繁星, 陈旭, 向轲, 曾广乾, 焦鹏, 王灵珏. 华南腹地茶永盆地白垩系古沙漠床沙构型定量重建与启示^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(6): 1372-1395.

HUANG Leqing, HU Nengyong, WEN Chunhua, MENG Fanxing, CHEN Xu, XIANG Ke, ZENG Guangqian, JIAO Peng, WANG Lingjue. Quantitative reconstruction and implications of the Cretaceous Aeolian bedform architecture in Chayong Basin,the hinterland of South China[J]. JOPC, 2024, 26(6): 1372-1395.

http://www.gdlxb.cn/CN/Y2024/V26/I6/1372

参考文献

[1] 曹硕. 2020. 中国东部晚白垩世风成沉积盆山型沙漠体系. 中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文.
[Cao S.2020. Late Cretaceous aeolian deposits in Eastern China: the intermountain erg system. Doctoral dissertation of China University of Geosciences(Beijing)]
[2] 陈留勤,李鹏程,郭福生,刘鑫,李馨敏. 2019. 粤北丹霞盆地晚白垩世丹霞组沉积相及古气候意义. 沉积学报, 37(1): 17-29.
[Chen L Q,Li P C,Guo F S,Liu X,Li X M.2019. Facies analysis and paleoclimate implications of the Late Cretaceous Danxia Formation in the Danxia Basin,northern Guangdong Province,South China. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 37(1): 17-29]
[3] 陈丕基. 1997. 晚白垩世中国东南沿岸山系与中南地区的沙漠和盐湖化. 地层学杂志, 21(3): 203-213.
[Chen P J.1997. Coastal mountains of SE China,desertization and saliniferous lakes of central China during the Upper Cretaceous. Journal of Stratigraphy, 21(3): 203-213]
[4] 黄乐清,黄建中,罗来,王先辉,刘耀荣,梁恩云,马慧英. 2019. 湖南衡阳盆地东缘白垩系风成沉积的发现及其古环境意义. 沉积学报, 37(4): 735-748.
[Huang L Q,Huang J Z,Luo L,Wang X H,Liu Y R,Liang E Y,Ma H Y.2019. The discovery of Cretaceous eolian deposits at the eastern margin of the Hengyang Basin,Hunan,and its paleoenvironmental significance. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 37(4): 735-748]
[5] 黄乐清,吴驰华,周丽芸,金妮,彭世良,胡能勇,杨长明,陈杰. 2023. 湖南郴州丹霞地貌景观特征、成因及演化探讨. 现代地质, 37(6): 1680-1694.
[Huang L Q,Wu C H,Zhou L Y,Jin N,Peng S L,Hu N Y,Yang C M,Chen J.2023. New perspectives of the features,formation,and evolution of the special Danxia landscape in Chenzhou,Hunan. Geoscience, 37(6): 1680-1694]
[6] 湖南省地质调查院. 2017. 中国区域地质志·湖南志. 北京: 地质出版社,1-300.
[Hunan Institute of Geological Survey. 2017. Regional Geology of China: Hunan Province. Beijing: Geological Publishing House,1-300]
[7] 李建华,董树文,赵国春,张岳桥,辛宇佳,王金铭,卢运可. 2024. 华南晚中生代大陆变形、深部过程及动力学. 地质学报, 98(3): 829-861.
[Li J H,Dong S W,Zhao G C,Zhang Y Q,Xin Y J,Wang J M,Lu Y K.2024. Late Mesozoic continental deformation,deep processes,and geodynamic evolution of South China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 98(3): 829-861]
[8] 刘林玉. 2003. 焉耆中生代原型盆地沉积特征与盆地边界的确定. 西北大学博士学位论文.
[Liu L Y.2003. Sedimentary characteristics of the Yanqi prototype basin in Mesozoic Era and the determination of the basin boundaries. Doctoral dissertation of Northwest University]
[9] 罗霖炎,高鑫,赵永成. 2023. 新月形沙丘表面流场特征. 中国沙漠, 43(4): 41-54.
[Luo L Y,Gao X,Zhao Y C.2023. The surface flow pattern characteristics of barchan dunes. Journal of Desert Research, 43(4): 41-54]
[10] 沈尚峰. 2008. 江汉盆地江陵凹陷的构造格架和演化. 中国地质大学(北京)硕士学位论文.
[Sheng S F.2008. Tectonic framework and evolution of Jiangling Depression in Jianghan Basin. Masteral dissertation of China University of Geosciences(Beijing)]
[11] 石宇翔,吴驰华,黄乐清,伊海生,李智武,焦海菁,杨嘉宝,秦江颖,张小凤,周亚楠,Juan Pedro Rodriguez-López.2023. 华南衡阳盆地上白垩统黄土类似物的初步研究. 地质学报, 97(9): 3101-3115.
[Shi Y X,Wu C H,Huang L Q,Yi H S,Li Z W,Jiao H J,Yang J B,Qin J Y,Zhang X F,Zhou Y N,Rodriguez-López J P.2023. Preliminary study of Late Cretaceous loess-like sediments in the Hengyang Basin,South China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 97(9): 3101-3115]
[12] 汤海磊,梁瑞,伊海生,李高杰. 2022. 楚雄盆地白垩纪晚期盐湖风成砂微观组构特征研究. 矿产综合利用,43(1): 57-70.
[Tang H L,Liang R,Yi H S,Li G J.2022. Study on the microstructure characteristics of Late Cretaceous aeolian sand in the playa from Chuxiong Basin. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources,43(1): 57-70]
[13] 吴学洪,徐亚东,许笑玮,张黎渊,何妍. 2023. 湘东南茶永盆地白垩纪—古近纪沉积古地理演化. 华南地质, 39(2): 214-234.
[Wu X H,Xu Y D,Xu X W,Zhang L Y,He Y.2023. Cretaceous-Paleogene paleogeographic evolution of the Chaling-Yongxing Basin in southeastern Hunan Province. South China Geology, 39(2): 214-234]
[14] 许欢,柳永清,旷红伟,彭楠,丁家翔,杜研,苑婷媛. 2023. 古风成沉积理论体系与研究进展. 沉积学报, 41(6): 1681-1713.
[Xu H,Liu Y Q,Kuang H W,Peng N,Ding J X,Du Y,Yuan T Y.2023. Theoretical system and research progress of eolian deposits. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 41(6): 1681-1713]
[15] 杨军怀. 2019. 塔克拉玛干沙漠沙丘移动研究. 陕西师范大学硕士学位论文.
[Yang J H.2019. A study of dune movement in the Taklamakan Desert. Masteral dissertation of Shaanxi Normal University]
[16] 朱筱敏,陈贺贺,谈明轩,李顺利,秦祎,杨棵. 2023. 从太平洋到喜马拉雅的沉积学新航程: 21届国际沉积学大会研究热点分析. 沉积学报, 41(1): 126-149.
[Zhu X M,Chen H H,Tan M X,Li S L,Qin Y,Yang K.2023. A new journey in sedimentology from the Pacific to the Himalayas: analysis of research hotpots from the 2l^st International Sedimentological Congress. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 41(1): 126-149]
[17] Bállico M B,Scherer C M S,Mountney N P,Souza E G,Reis A D,Raja Gabaglia G P,Magalhães A J C.2017a. Sedimentary cycles in a Mesoproterozoic aeolian erg-margin succession: Mangabeira Formation,Espinhaço Supergroup,Brazil. Sedimentary Geology, 349: 1-14.
[18] Bállico M B,Scherer C M S,Mountney N P,Souza E G,Chemale F,Pisarevsky S A,Reis A D.2017b. Wind-pattern circulation as a palaeogeographic indicator: case study of the 1.5-1.6 Ga Mangabeira Formation,São Francisco Craton,Northeast Brazil. Precambrian Research, 298: 1-15.
[19] Bigarella J J.1972. Eolian environments: their characteristics,recognition,and importance. In: Rigby J K,Hamblin W K(eds). Recognition of Ancient Sedimentary Environments. SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.
[20] Bristow C S,Skelly R L,Ethridge F G.1999. Crevasse splays from the rapidly aggrading,sand-bed,braided Niobrara River,Nebraska: effect of base-level rise. Sedimentology, 46: 1029-1047.
[21] Bryant R.2010. Deserts and desert environments. The Geographical Journal, 176(1): 119.
[22] Cao S,Zhang L M,Wang C S,Ma J,Tan J,Zhang Z H.2020. Sedimentological characteristics and aeolian architecture of a plausible intermountain erg system in Southeast China during the Late Cretaceous. GSA Bulletin, 132: 2475-2488.
[23] Cao S,Ma J,Wang C.2023a. The sedimentological characteristics of the intermontane desert system in the Jurong Basin,South China and its relationship with the Late Cretaceous hot climate. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, 623: 111618.
[24] Cao S,Ma J,Zhang L M.2023b. Quantitative reconstruction of Early Cretaceous dune morphology in the Ordos paleo-desert and its paleoclimatic implications. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11: 1142034.
[25] Cao S,Zhang L M,Mountney N P,Ma J,Hao M G,Wang C S.2023c. Ultra-long-distance transport of aeolian sand: the provenance of an intermontane desert,south-east China. Sedimentology, 70(7): 2108-2126.
[26] Chen Y,Meng J,Liu H,Wang C S,Tang M,Liu T,Zhao Y N.2022. Detrital zircons record the evolution of the Cathaysian Coastal Mountains along the South China margin. Basin Research, 34(2): 688-701.
[27] Chu Y,Lin W,Faure M,Allen M B,Feng Z T.2020. Cretaceous exhumation of the Triassic intracontinental Xuefengshan Belt: delayed unroofing of an orogenic plateau across the South China Block?Tectonophysics, 793: 228592.
[28] Cosgrove G I E,Colombera L,Mountney N P.2021. Quantitative analysis of the sedimentary architecture of eolian successions developed under icehouse and greenhouse climatic conditions. GSA Bulletin, 133: 2625-2644.
[29] Cosgrove G I E,Colombera L,Mountney N P.2023a. Quantitative analysis of aeolian stratigraphic architectures preserved in different tectonic settings. Earth-Science Reviews, 237: 104293.
[30] Cosgrove G I E,Colombera L,Mountney N P,Basilici G,Mesquita Á F,Soares M V.2023b. Precambrian aeolian systems: a unique record?Precambrian Research, 392: 107075.
[31] Crouvi O,Amit R,Enzel Y,Porat N,Sandler A.2008. Sand dunes as a major proximal dust source for late Pleistocene loess in the Negev desert,Israel. Quaternary Research,70: 275-282.
[32] Dong S W,Li J H,Gao R,Cawood P A,Thybo H,Johnston S T,Jiao L Q,Zhang Y Q,Wang J M.2023. Intraplate lithospheric extension revealed by seismic reflection profiling of South China. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 609: 118100.
[33] Folk R L,Ward W C.1957. A study in the significance of grain size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology,27: 3-26.
[34] Hasegawa H,Imsamut S,Charusiri P,Tada R,Horiuchi Y,Hisada K I.2010. ‘Thailand was a desert' during the mid-Cretaceous: equatorward shift of the subtropical high-pressure belt indicated by eolian deposits(Phu Thok Formation)in the Khorat Basin,northeastern Thailand: Thailand was a desert in the mid-Cretaceous. Island Arc, 19: 605-621.
[35] Hasegawa H,Tada R,Jiang X,Suganuma Y,Imsamut S,Charusiri P,Ichinnorov N,Khand Y.2012. Drastic shrinking of the Hadley circulation during the mid-Cretaceous Supergreenhouse. Climate of the Past, 8: 1323-1337.
[36] Hay W W.2011. Can humans force a return to a‘Cretaceous' climate?Sedimentary Geology, 235: 5-26.
[37] Hême de Lacotte V J P,Mountney N P.2022. A classification scheme for sedimentary architectures arising from aeolian-fluvial system interactions: Permian examples from southeast Utah,USA. Aeolian Research, 58: 100815.
[38] Howell J,Mountney N.2001. Aeolian grain flow architecture: hard data for reservoir models and implications for red bed sequence stratigraphy. Petroleum Geoscience, 7: 51-56.
[39] Jiao H J,Wu C H,Rodríguez-López J P,Sun X M,Yi H S.2020. Late Cretaceous plateau deserts in the South China Block,and Quaternary analogues: sedimentology,dune reconstruction and wind-water interactions. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 120: 104504.
[40] Jones F H,dos Santos Scherer C M,Kifumbi C.2021. Aeolian dunes morphodynamics and wind regime reconstruction in mid-latitudes of the Gondwana during Early Permian,Aracaré Formation,Sergipe-Alagoas Basin,Brazil. Aeolian Research, 50: 100672.
[41] Kifumbi C,dos Santos Scherer C M,Dalla Lana Michel R,dos Reis A D,Guadagnin F,de Souza E G,Ferronatto J P F,Jones F H.2023. Spatial and temporal variation in the evolution of ancient aeolian dune-field, the Pennsylvanian Piauí Formation(Parnaíba Basin),Brazil. Sedimentary Geology, 451: 106398.
[42] Kocurek G.1981. Significance of interdune deposits and bounding surfaces in aeolian dune sands. Sedimentology, 28: 753-780.
[43] Kocurek G,Nielson J.1986. Conditions favourable for the formation of warm-climate aeolian sand sheets. Sedimentology, 33: 795-816.
[44] Kocurek G,Day M.2018. What is preserved in the aeolian rock record?a Jurassic Entrada sandstone case study at the Utah-Arizona border. Sedimentology, 65: 1301-1321.
[45] Lancaster N,Mountney N P.2021. Eolian processes and sediments. In: Encyclopedia of Geology. Amsterdam: Elsevier,809-829.
[46] Li J H,Zhang Y Q,Dong S W,Johnston S T.2014. Cretaceous tectonic evolution of South China: a preliminary synthesis. Earth-Science Reviews, 134: 98-136.
[47] Liang P,Yang X P.2023. Grain shape evolution of sand-sized sediments during transport from mountains to dune fields. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 128: e2022JF006930.
[48] Mesquita Á F,Basilici G,Soares M V T,Janočko J,Mountney N P,Colombera L,de Souza Filho C R.2021. Hybrid dry-wet interdune deposition in Precambrian aeolian systems: Galho do Miguel Formation,SE Brazil. Sedimentary Geology, 425: 106007.
[49] Mountney N P.2004. Feature: the sedimentary signature of deserts and their response to environmental change. Geology Today, 20: 101-106.
[50] Mountney N P.2006. Periodic accumulation and destruction of aeolian erg sequences in the Permian Cedar Mesa Sandstone,White Canyon,southern Utah,USA. Sedimentology, 53: 789-823.
[51] Mountney N P.2012. A stratigraphic model to account for complexity in aeolian dune and interdune successions: modelling aeolian dune-interdune architecture. Sedimentology, 59: 964-989.
[52] Mountney N,Howell J.2000. Aeolian architecture,bedform climbing and preservation space in the Cretaceous Etjo Formation,NW Namibia. Sedimentology, 47: 825-849.
[53] Mountney N P,Thompson D B.2002. Stratigraphic evolution and preservation of aeolian dune and damp/wet interdune strata: an example from the Triassic Helsby Sandstone Formation,Cheshire Basin,UK. Sedimentology, 49: 805-833.
[54] Mountney N P,Russell A J.2009. Aeolian dune-field development in a water table-controlled system: Skeidarársandur,Southern Iceland. Sedimentology, 56: 2107-2131.
[55] Mountney N,Howell J,Flint S,Jerram D.1999. Climate,sediment supply and tectonics as controls on the deposition and preservation of the aeolian-fluvial Etjo Sandstone Formation,Namibia. Journal of the Geological Society, 156: 771-777.
[56] Paterson G A,Heslop D.2015. New methods for unmixing sediment grain size data. Geochemistry,Geophysics,Geosystems, 16: 4494-4506.
[57] Postma G.1990. Depositional architecture and facies of river and fan deltas: a synthesis. In: Coarse-Grained Deltas(1st ed). Wiley: 13-27.
[58] Pulvertaft T C R.1985. Aeolian dune and wet interdune sedimentation in the Middle Proterozoic Dala sandstone,Sweden. Sedimentary Geology, 44: 93-111.
[59] Rodríguez-López J P,Wu C H.2020. Recurrent deformations of aeolian desert dunes in the Cretaceous of the South China Block: trigger mechanisms variability and implications for aeolian reservoirs. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 119: 104483.
[60] Rodríguez-López J P,Meléndez N,De Boer P L,Soria A R.2012. Controls on marine-erg margin cycle variability: aeolian-marine interaction in the mid-Cretaceous Iberian Desert System,Spain: aeolian-marine interaction in the mid-Cretaceous Iberian Desert System,Spain. Sedimentology, 59: 466-501.
[61] Rodríguez-López J P,Clemmensen L B,Lancaster N,Mountney N P,Veiga G D.2014. Archean to recent aeolian sand systems and their sedimentary record: current understanding and future prospects. Sedimentology, 61: 1487-1534.
[62] Romain H G,Mountney N P.2014. Reconstruction of three-dimensional eolian dune architecture from one-dimensional core data through adoption of analog data from outcrop. AAPG Bulletin, 98(1): 1-22.
[63] Rubin M,Hunter R E.1983. Reconstructing bedform assemblages from compound crossbedding. Developments in Sedimentology, 38: 407-427.
[64] Rubin D M,Carter C L.1987. Cross-Bedding,Bedforms,and Paleocurrents. SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology.
[65] Sun Z M,Yang Z Y,Yang T,Pei J L,Yu Q F.2006. New Late Cretaceous and Paleogene paleomagnetic results from South China and their geodynamic implications. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth,111(B3): B03101.
[66] Suo Y H,Li S Z,Jin C,Zhang Y,Zhou J,Li X Y,Wang P C,Liu Z,Wang X Y,Somerville I.2019. Eastward tectonic migration and transition of the Jurassic-Cretaceous Andean-type continental margin along Southeast China. Earth-Science Reviews, 196: 102884.
[67] Tang S L,Yan D P,Qiu L,Gao J F,Wang C L.2014. Partitioning of the Cretaceous Pan-Yangtze Basin in the central South China Block by exhumation of the Xuefeng Mountains during a transition from extensional to compressional tectonics?Gondwana Research, 25: 1644-1659.
[68] Vandenberghe J,Sun Y,Wang X,Abels H A,Liu X.2018. Grain-size characterization of reworked fine-grained aeolian deposits. Earth-Science Reviews, 177: 43-52.
[69] Wu C H,Rodríguez-López J P.2021. Cryospheric processes in Quaternary and Cretaceous hyper-arid plateau desert oases. Sedimentology, 68: 755-770.
[70] Wu C H,Liu C L,Yi H S,Xia G Q,Zhang H,Wang L C,Li G J,Wagreich M.2017. Mid-Cretaceous desert system in the Simao Basin,southwestern China,and its implications for sea-level change during a greenhouse climate. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, 468: 529-544.
[71] Wu C H,Rodríguez-López J P,Liu C L,Sun X M,Wang J Y,Xia G Q,Wagreich M.2018. Late Cretaceous climbing erg systems in the western Xinjiang Basin: palaeoatmosphere dynamics and East Asia margin tectonic forcing on desert expansion and preservation. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 93: 539-552.
[72] Wu C H,Rodríguez-López J P,Santosh M.2022. Plateau archives of lithosphere dynamics,cryosphere and paleoclimate: the formation of Cretaceous desert basins in east Asia. Geoscience Frontiers, 13: 101454.
[73] Wu C H,Sun X M,Li G W,Huang L Q,Jiao H J,Li Z W,Jian X,Mason C C,Rodríguez-López J P.2023. Cretaceous mountain building processes triggered the aridification and drainage evolution in East Asia. GSA Bulletin, 136(5-6): 1863-1877.
[74] Xu H,Liu Y Q,Kuang H W,Peng N.2019. Late Jurassic fluvial-eolian deposits from the Tianchihe Formation,Ningwu-Jingle Basin,Shanxi Province,China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 174: 245-262.
[75] Yu X C,Liu C L,Wang C L,Li F,Wang J Y.2020. Eolian deposits of the northern margin of the South China(Jianghan Basin): reconstruction of the Late Cretaceous East Asian landscape in central China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 117: 104390.
[76] Yu X C,Liu C L,Wang C L,Wang J Y.2021a. Late Cretaceous aeolian desert system within the Mesozoic fold belt of South China: palaeoclimatic changes and tectonic forcing of East Asian erg development and preservation. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, 567: 110299.
[77] Yu X C,Wang C L,Bertolini G,Liu C L,Wang J Y.2021b. Damp- to dry aeolian systems: sedimentology,climate forcing,and aeolian accumulation in the Late Cretaceous Liyou Basin,South China. Sedimentary Geology, 426: 106030.
[78] Zhang J,Liu Y G,Flögel S,Zhang T,Wang C S,Fang X M.2021. Altitude of the East Asian coastal mountains and their influence on Asian climate during early Late Cretaceous. Journal of Geophysical Research(Atmospheres), 126: e2020JD034413.
[79] Zhang L M,Wang C S,Cao K,Wang Q,Tan J,Gao Y.2016. High elevation of Jiaolai Basin during the Late Cretaceous: implication for the coastal mountains along the East Asian margin. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 456: 112-123.
[80] Zhang X D,Wang H M,Xu S M,Yang Z S.2020. A basic end-member model algorithm for grain-size data of marine sediments. Estuarine,Coastal and Shelf Science, 236: 106656.
[81] Zheng C Y,Wang J Y,Li X H,Zhang C K.2024. Intermontane erg environment and arid climate indicated from associated eolian and alluvial fan facies during the Late Cretaceous,South China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 264: 106044.
[82] Zhou N,Li Q,Zhang C L,Huang C H,Wu Y B,Zhu B Q,Cen S B,Huang X Q.2021. Grain size characteristics of aeolian sands and their implications for the aeolian dynamics of dunefields within a river valley on the southern Tibet Plateau: a case study from the Yarlung Zangbo river valley. Catena, 196: 104794.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

华南腹地茶永盆地白垩系古沙漠床沙构型定量重建与启示^*

Quantitative reconstruction and implications of the Cretaceous Aeolian bedform architecture in Chayong Basin,the hinterland of South China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘强, 张莹. 松辽盆地榆东地区泉头组四段特低—超低渗储集层成岩作用与成岩相^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(2): 499-516.
[2]	孟庆涛, 张训, 杨亮, 高家俊, 刘招君, 胡菲, 邢济麟, 张成铭, 康嘉楠, 崔博, 董秦玮, 张恩威. 陆相拗陷湖盆细粒沉积有机质富集机制研究: 以松辽盆地长岭凹陷青山口组为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(2): 401-415.
[3]	赵健龙, 张元福, 袁晓冬, 霍艳翠, 葛鹏程, 蔡曦曜. 深源物质对滦平盆地白垩系西瓜园组古环境及油气成藏的影响^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(6): 1394-1406.
[4]	孙海涛, 黄小洁, 杨柳, 范国章, 黄小娟, 王红平, 钟大康, 周思宇. 巴西桑托斯盆地下白垩统湖相碳酸盐岩球粒—树枝状组构特征与成因^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(5): 1199-1210.
[5]	李高榕, 魏凡, 丛培允. 华南埃迪卡拉纪—寒武纪宏体藻类化石的时空分布与多样性变化^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(2): 451-470.
[6]	周志强, 赵景宇, 王嘉树, 吴成洋, 肖彪, 黄璞. 贵州都匀下泥盆统蟒山群Zosterophyllum australianum(澳大利亚工蕨)新材料及其古地理意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(3): 479-492.
[7]	蔡青松, 杨光亮, 范育新, 颜雪域, 高敏敏, 张青松, 王荣华, 郭雪莲. 兰州第四纪黄土/古土壤序列物源演变: 来自于碳酸盐矿物的证据^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(3): 583-598.
[8]	陆鹿, 陈树光, 李壮福, 秦勇, 屈争辉, 沈玉林. 河套盆地临河坳陷白垩纪—古近纪沉积环境演化及油气地质意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(2): 308-331.
[9]	董艳蕾, 陈祥, 伍炜, 杨道庆, 杨棵, 苏彬, 程逸凡, 左一苇, 赵瑞星, 邹通, 朱筱敏. 准噶尔盆地西北部春光探区白垩系地震沉积学研究^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(3): 412-427.
[10]	朱世发, 贾业, 万超凡, 马立驰, 崔殿, 孙超, 景安语. 济阳坳陷富林洼陷中生界复杂岩性风化壳储集层成岩作用^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(3): 555-569.
[11]	罗进雄, 何幼斌, 何明薇, 陈晓辉. 华南中二叠统眼球状石灰岩特征及成因的思考^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(4): 613-626.
[12]	余义常, 宋新民, 郭睿, 高兴军, 林敏捷, 衣丽萍, 韩海英, 陈军, 邓亚, 李峰峰, 刘航宇. 生物碎屑灰岩差异成岩及储集层特征:以伊拉克HF油田白垩系Mishirif组为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(6): 1053-1067.
[13]	程延, 李志忠, 靳建辉, 徐晓琳, 李志星, 刘小菊. 标准生长曲线法在华南沿海老红砂石英光释光测年中的适用性^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(3): 501-514.
[14]	杨帆, 李孝泽. 宁夏固原古近系寺口子组砂岩成因探讨^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(3): 445-456.
[15]	钟建华,倪良田,郝兵, 孙宁亮, 刘闯, 罗可, 陈彬, 刘圣鑫, 邵珠福. 鄂尔多斯盆地下白垩统大型类碟状构造的发现及其地质意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(1): 73-88.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

华南腹地茶永盆地白垩系古沙漠床沙构型定量重建与启示*

Quantitative reconstruction and implications of the Cretaceous Aeolian bedform architecture in Chayong Basin,the hinterland of South China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

华南腹地茶永盆地白垩系古沙漠床沙构型定量重建与启示^*