山东灵山岛北背来石剖面下白垩统顺层砂脉的特征及其成因动力学分析<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>

doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2020.04.043

古地理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 635-646. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2020.04.043

• 岩相古地理学及沉积学 • 上一篇下一篇

山东灵山岛北背来石剖面下白垩统顺层砂脉的特征及其成因动力学分析^*

钟建华¹, 孙宁亮², 郝兵², 倪良田², 宋冠先², 薛纯琦², 毛毳³, 邵珠福³, 葛毓柱⁴, 陈彬², 刘圣鑫², 彭超峰², 谷东辉², 王永强², 李聪²

1 中国矿业大学(北京)煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室,北京 100083;
2 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院,山东青岛 266580;
3 东北石油大学地球科学学院,黑龙江大庆 163318;
4 地质、矿物学与地球物理学学院,波鸿大学,波鸿 44801,德国

收稿日期:2019-09-08 修回日期:2019-12-20 出版日期:2020-08-01 发布日期:2020-08-10
作者简介:钟建华,男,1957年生,教授,主要从事沉积学研究。E-mail: 957576033@qq.com。
基金资助:
*国家自然科学基金项目(编号: 41572088)资助

Characteristics and dynamics origin of the Lower Cretaceous sill in northern Beilaishi section of Lingshan Island, Shandong Province

Zhong Jian-Hua¹, Sun Ning-Liang², Hao Bing², Ni Liang-Tian², Song Guan-Xian², Xue Chun-Qi², Mao Cui³, Shao Zhu-Fu³, Ge Yu-Zhu⁴, Chen Bin², Liu Sheng-Xin², Peng Chao-Feng², Gu Dong-Hui², Wang Yong-Qiang², Li Cong²

1 State Key Laboratory Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China;
2 School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum(East China),Shandong Qingdao 266580,China;
3 School of Earth Sciences,Northeast Petroleum University,Heilongjiang Daqing 163318,China;
4 Institute for Geology,Mineralogy and Geophysics,Ruhr University,Bochum 44801,Germany

Received:2019-09-08 Revised:2019-12-20 Online:2020-08-01 Published:2020-08-10
About author:Zhong Jian-Hua,born in 1957,is a professor and mainly engaged in sedimentology. E-mail: 957576033@qq.com.
Supported by:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(No. 41572088)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 山东灵山岛北背来石剖面下白垩统莱阳组发育大量砂脉。根据砂脉与层面的关系,将其分为顺层砂脉和非顺层砂脉。前者主要发育在三角洲前缘黑色泥岩中,顶、底界面普遍参差不齐,常与软沉积变形构造共生。在分析砂脉特征的基础上,建立了非地震条件下顺层砂脉侵入的物理模型和公式,推导出液化砂层的深度与侵位深度和上覆沉积层厚度之间的关系,认为形成大型砂脉的液化砂层深度都很大。该实例对研究砂脉的成因、湖泊相关沉积及盆地构造运动具有重要意义。

关键词: 砂脉(砂床), 动力学, 下白垩统, 灵山岛

Abstract: A lot of sand dikes are found in the Lower Cretaceous Laiyang Formation in northern Beilaishi section located in the Lingshan Island of Shandong Province. There are two types including bedding sand dikes and unbedding sand dikes based on their relationship with the bedding plane. The bedding sand dikes, which are often associated with soft sedimentary deformation, are mainly developed in the black mudstone of delta front, and their top and bottom interfaces are generally uneven. Based on the characteristics of sand dikes, the physical model and formula of bedding sand dikes under non-seismic condition are established. The relationship between the depth of liquefied sand layer, the emplacement depth and thickness of overlying sediment layer is deduced. It is considered that the depth of liquefied sand layer which forms large sand veins is very deep. This paper is of great significance in studying the origin of sand veins, lake related deposition and basin tectonic movement.

Key words: sand dikes, dynamics, Lower Cretaceous, Lingshan Island

中图分类号:

P512.2

钟建华, 孙宁亮, 郝兵, 倪良田, 宋冠先, 薛纯琦, 毛毳, 邵珠福, 葛毓柱, 陈彬, 刘圣鑫, 彭超峰, 谷东辉, 王永强, 李聪. 山东灵山岛北背来石剖面下白垩统顺层砂脉的特征及其成因动力学分析^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(4): 635-646.

Zhong Jian-Hua, Sun Ning-Liang, Hao Bing, Ni Liang-Tian, Song Guan-Xian, Xue Chun-Qi, Mao Cui, Shao Zhu-Fu, Ge Yu-Zhu, Chen Bin, Liu Sheng-Xin, Peng Chao-Feng, Gu Dong-Hui, Wang Yong-Qiang, Li Cong. Characteristics and dynamics origin of the Lower Cretaceous sill in northern Beilaishi section of Lingshan Island, Shandong Province[J]. JOPC, 2020, 22(4): 635-646.

http://www.gdlxb.cn/CN/Y2020/V22/I4/635

参考文献

[1] 葛毓柱,钟建华,樊晓芳,任启强,邵珠福. 2015. 山东灵山岛滑塌体内部沉积及构造特征研究. 地质论评, 61(3): 634-643.
[Ge Y Z,Zhong J H,Fan X F,Ren Q Q,Shao Z F.2015. Study on internal sedimentary and structural features of the slump body in Lingshan Island,Qingdao,Shandong. Geological Review, 61(3): 634-643]
[2] 葛毓柱,钟建华. 2017. 山东灵山岛滑塌体内部沉积及构造特征研究. 地质论评, 63(4): 927-940.
[Ge Y Z,Zhong J H.2017. Discussion about triggers of Early Cretaceous soft-sediment deformation structures on the Lingshan Island and the implications for palaeo-environment. Geological Review, 63(4): 927-940]
[3] 李守军,张祥玉,赵秀丽,孙智新,张道元,章磊,徐磊,魏宁,刘宝梅. 2017. 山东省青岛市灵山岛下白垩统中发现鱼类和叶肢介化石. 地质论评, 63(1): 1-6.
[Li S J,Zhang X Y,Zhao X L,Sun Z X,Zhang D Y,Zhang L,Xu L,Wei N,Liu B M.2017. Discovery of fish and conchostracan fossils in Lower Cretaceous in Lingshan island,Qingdao,Shandong. Geological Review, 63(1): 1-6]
[4] 吕洪波,张海春,王俊,张素箐,董晓朋,张星. 2013. 灵山岛早白垩世复理石不是陆内三角洲沉积: 答钟建华教授. 地质论评, 59(1): 11-14.
[Lü H B,Zhang H C,Wang J,Zhang S Q,Dong X P,Zhang X.2013. The Early Cretaceous polylith of Lingshan Island is not the deposit of the continental delta: Reply to Professor Zhong Jianhua. Geological Review, 59(1): 11-14].
[5] 梅冥相,高金汉,孟庆芬,刘智荣. 2009. 前寒武纪与微生物席相关的粉砂岩岩墙: 以天津蓟县古元古界串岭沟组为例. 古地理学报, 11(1): 37-50.
[Mei M X,Gao J H,Meng Q F,Liu Z R.2009. Microbial mat-related silty dykes of the Precambrian: An examplefrom the Paleoproterozoic Chuanlinggou Formation at Jixian section in Tianjin. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 11(1): 37-50]
[6] 乔秀夫,郭宪璞,叶留生,何碧竹,周玮. 2011. 新疆塔中卡塔克隆起加里东构造运动的古地震证据. 岩石学报, 27(1): 243-252.
[Qiao X F,Guo X P,Ye L S,He B Z,Zhou W.2011. Paleoseismic evidence of the Caledonian Movement at Kartarke uplift in the central Tarim,Xinjiang. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(1): 243-252]
[7] 邵珠福,钟建华,李勇,倪良田,刘圣鑫,范莉红,陈彬. 2014. 青岛灵山岛晚中生代重力流沉积特征及环境分析. 地质论评, 60(3): 555-566.
[Shao Z F,Zhong J H,Li Y, Ni L T,Liu S X,Fan L H,Chen B.2014. The sedimentary characteristics and environment alanalys of Late Mesozoic gravity flows in Lingshan Island. Geological Review, 60(3): 555-566]
[8] 史晓颖,蒋干清,张传恒,刘娟,高林志. 2008. 华北地台中元古代串岭沟组页岩中的砂脉构造: 17×10⁸年前甲烷气逃逸的沉积标识?地球科学, 33(5): 577-590.
[Shi X Y,Jiang G Q,Zhang CH,Liu J,Gao L Z.2008. Sand veins and microbially induced sedimentary structures from the black shale of the Mesoproterozoic Chuanlinggou Formation(ca. 1.7 Ga)in North China: Implications for methane degassing from microbial mats. Earth Science, 33(5): 577-590]
[9] 田洪水,van Loon A J,王华林,张慎河,祝介旺. 2016. 大盛群中的震积岩: 郯庐断裂带强构造与地震活动新证据. 中国科学: 地球科学, 46(1): 79-96.
[Tian H S,van Loon A J,Wang H L,Zhang S H,Zhu J W.2016. Seismites in the Dasheng Group: New evidence of strong tectonic and earthquake activities of the Tanlu Fault Zone. Science in China: Earth Science, 46(1): 79-96]
[10] 王安东,周瑶琪,张振凯,于珊珊,王子阳. 2014. 山东灵山岛莱阳群水下非构造裂缝特征及意义. 地球学报, 35(3): 321-328.
[Wang A D,Zhou Y Q,Zhang Z K,Yu S S,Wang Z Y.2014. Characteristics and significance of underwater non-tectonic cracks in Laiyang Group of Lingshan Island,Shandong Province. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 35(3): 321-328]
[11] 杨冠群,钟建华,郝兵,孙宁亮. 2017. 基于岩心岩脉弯曲度的泥岩压实率研究. 能源与环保, 39(7): 69-76.
[Yang G Q,Zhong J H,Hao B,Sun N L.2017. Discussion about mudstone compaction rate with curvature of sandstone dikes in cores. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 39(7): 69-76]
[12] 袁静,陈鑫,张善文. 2008. 济阳坳陷古近系软沉积物变形层中的砂岩脉特征. 石油学报, 29(3): 336-340.
[Yuan J,Chen X,Zhang S W.2008. Characteristics of sand dikes in the Paleogene soft-sediments of Jiyang Depression. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 29(3): 336-340]
[13] 张昌民,张尚锋,朱锐,杜家元. 2012. 珠江口盆地砂岩侵入体的识别特征及其石油地质意义. 石油学报, 33(2): 188-194.
[Zhang C M,Zhang S F,Zhu R,Du J Y.2012. Recognition criteria for sandinjectites in the Zhujiangkou Basin and their significance in petroleum geology. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 33(2): 188-194]
[14] 钟建华. 1997. 砂岩岩脉(岩墙、岩床)的一种可能成因: 冲蚀沟槽的充填. 岩相古地理, 17(2): 32-36.
[Zhong J H.1997. Filling gullies by eolian sand: A possible genesis of sandstone veins(dike and sills). Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography, 17(2): 32-36]
[15] 钟建华. 2012. 灵山岛中生代沉积岩是深水远源浊积岩、还是陆内三角洲沉积?与吕洪波教授商榷. 地质论评, 58(6): 1180-1182.
[Zhong J H.2012. Lingshan Island Mesozoic sedimentary rock is the deep source turbidite far,or intracontinental delta deposit: Discusswith Professor Lü Hongbo. Geological Review, 58(6): 1180-1182]
[16] 钟建华,倪良田,邵珠福,李勇,刘选,毛毳,刘圣鑫,孙宁亮,陈彬,王凯,罗可,王韶洁,刘闯,刘宝,熊志强. 2016. 青岛灵山岛下白垩统风暴岩与风暴沉积的发现及意义. 古地理学报, 18(3): 381-398.
[Zhong J H,Ni L T,Shao Z F,Li Y,Liu X,Mao C,Liu S X,Sun N L,Chen B,Wang K,Luo K,Wang S J,Liu C,Liu B,Xiong Z Q.Tempestites and storm deposits in the Lower Cretaceous from Lingshan Island,Qingdao. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 18(3): 381-398]
[17] 钟建华,曹梦春,倪良田,孙宁亮,刘闯,郝兵,杨冠群,宋冠先,葛毓柱. 2018. 砂脉的研究现状与进展. 古地理学报, 19(1): 73-88.
[Zhong J H,Cao M C,Ni L T,Sun N L,Liu C,Hao B,Yang G Q,Song G X, Ge Y Z.2018. Situation of study and development tendency of sandy dikes. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 19(1): 73-88]
[18] 钟建华,王永卓,倪良田,高春文,周永柄,毛毳,樊晓东,刘国志,陈志鹏,宋冠先,王瑞,黄亮,刘强,范玉娇,任凯旋. 2020. 砂脉(砂侵入体)型储层与油藏:以松辽盆地长垣地区西部萨葡夹层为例. 地球科学与环境学报,42(3): 285-296.
[Zhong J H,Wang Y Z,Ni L T,Gao C W,Zhou Y B,Mao C,Fan X D,Liu G Z,Chen Z P,Song G X,Wang R,Huang L,Liu Q,Fan Y J,Ren K X.2020. Sand dike(sand injection) type of reservoir and oil-pool: A case study of Sapu Interlayer in the western of Changyuan area, Songliao Basin, China. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 42(3): 285-296]
[19] 周瑶琪,张振凯,梁文栋,李素,岳会雯. 2015. 山东东部晚中生代构造—岩浆活动及原型盆地恢复. 地学前缘, 22(1): 137-156.
[Zhou Q Y,Zhang Z K,Liang W D,Li S,Yue H W.2015. Late Mesozoic tectono-magmatic activities and prototype basin restoration in eastern Shandong Province,China. Earth Science Frontiers, 22(1): 137-156]
[20] 朱光,王道轩,刘国生,宋传中,徐嘉炜,牛漫兰. 2001. 郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景. 地质科学, 36(3): 266-278.
[Zhu G,Wang D X,Liu G S,Song C Z,Xu J W,Niu M L.2001. Extensional activities along the Tanlu fault zone and its geodynamic setting. Chinese Journal of Geology, 36(3): 266-278]
[21] Andrew H,Anthony S,Mario V.2011. Physical characteristics of sand injectites. Earth-Science Reviews, 106: 215-246.
[22] Andrew H,Mario V.2017. Saucer-shaped sandstone intrusions: An under played reservoir target. AAPG Bulletin, 101(4): 625-633.
[23] Delaney P T,Pollard J I Z,Mckie E H.1986. Field relations between dikes and joints: Emplacement processes and paleostress analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91: 4920-4938.
[24] Duranti M D,Guargena C G,Holm K,Prat P,Steinsland N,Hurst A,Cronin B T,Cartwright J A.2003. Sandstone intrusions: Detection and significance for exploration and production. First Break, 21: 15-24.
[25] Gladkov A S,Lobova E U,Deev E V,Korzhenkovcd A M,Mazeikae J V,Abdievad S V,Rogozhinc E A,Rodkinf M V,Fortunag A B,Charimovg T A,Yudakhin A S.2016. Earthquake-induced soft-sedimentdeformation structures in Late Pleistocene lacustrine deposits of Issyk-Kullake(Kyrgyzstan). Sedimentary Geology, 344: 112-122.
[26] Hiscotf R N.1979. Clastic sills and dikes associated with deep-water sandstones,Tourelle Formation,Ordovician,Quebec. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 49: 1-9.
[27] Cartwright J,Duranti A D,Huuse M,Nelson M.2005. Sand injectites: An emerging global play in deep-water clastic environments. In: Dore A G, Vining B(eds). Petroleum geology: North-west Europe and global perspectives: Proceedings of the 6th Petroleum Geology Conference. London,Petroleum Geology Conferences Ltd.: Geological Society(London),133-144.
[28] Hurst A,Vigorito M.2017. Saucer-shaped sandstone intrusions: An underplayed reservoir target. AAPG Bulletin, 101(4): 625-633.
[29] Huuse M,Marit M.2004. Eocene sandstone intrusions in the Tampen Spur area(Norwegian North Sea Quad 34)imaged by 3D seismic data. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 21: 141-155.
[30] Huuse M.2010. Integrated analysis of shallow fluid flow phenomena and hydrocarbon migration in the southern Kwanza Basin,Offshore Angola. Annals of Epidemiology, 20(3): 171-181.
[31] Johan B S,Henrik J H,Thomas S,Michael K E.2010. Sand remobilization and injection above an active salt diaper: The Tyr sand of the Nini Field,Eastern North Sea. Basin Research, 22: 548-561.
[32] Lonergan L,Le N,Johnson H D,Cartwright J A,Jolly R J H.2000. Remobilization and injection in deep water depositional systems: Implications for reservoir architecture and prediction. Gulf Coast Section SEPM Foundation 20th Annual Research Conference on Deep-Water Reservoirs of the World: 515-532.
[33] Lorenz J C,Teufel L W, Warpinski N R.1991. Regional fractures 1: A mechanism for the formation of regional fractures at depth in flat-lying reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin, 75: 1714-1737.
[34] Monnier D,Gay A,Imbert P,Cavailhes T,Soliva R,Lopez M.2015. Sand injectites network as a marker of the palaeoestress field,the structural framework and the distance to the sand source: Example in the Vocontian Basin,SE France. Journal of Structural Geology, 79: 1-18.
[35] Murchison R I.1827. On the ooal-field of brora in Sutherlandshire,andsome other stratified deposits in the north of Scotland. Transactions of the Geological Society of London, 2: 293-326.
[36] Obermeier S F.1996. Use of liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis: An overview of how seismic liquefaction features can be distinguished from other features and how their regional distribution and properties of source sediment can be used to infer the location and strength of Holocene paleo-earthquakes. Engineering Geology, 44: 1-76.
[37] Owen G,Moretti M.2001. Identifying triggers for liquefaction-induced soft-sediment deformation in sands. Sedimentary Geology, 235: 141-147.
[38] Peterson G L.1968. Flow structures in sandstone dikes. Sedimentary Geology, 2: 177-190.
[39] Price N J,Cosgrove J W.1990. Analysis of Geological Structures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,502.
[40] Purvis K,Kao J,Flanagan K,Henderson J,Duranti D.2002. Complex reservoir geometries in a deep water clastic sequence,Gryphon Field,UKCS: Injection structures,geological modelling and reservoir simulation. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 19(2): 161-179.
[41] Ross J A,Peakall J,Keevil G M.2014. Facies and flow regimes of sandstone hosted columnar intrusions: Insights from the pipes of Kodachrome Basin State Park. Sedimentology, 61(6): 1764-1792.
[42] Strangways H F.1821. Geological sketch of the environs of petersburg. Transactions of the Geological Society of London: 392-458.
[43] Winslow M. A.1983. Clastic dike swans and the structural evolution of the foreland fold and thrust belt of the southern Andes. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 94: 1073-1080.
[44] Zheng L,Jiang Z,Liu H,Kong X,Li H,Jiang X.2015. Core evidence of paleoseismic events in Paleogene deposits of the Shulu sag in the Bohai Bay Basin,east China,and their petroleum geologic significance. Sedimentary Geology, 328: 33-54.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

山东灵山岛北背来石剖面下白垩统顺层砂脉的特征及其成因动力学分析^*

Characteristics and dynamics origin of the Lower Cretaceous sill in northern Beilaishi section of Lingshan Island, Shandong Province

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	毛小平, 陈修蓉, 李振, 李书现, 朱启轩. 从水动力学角度看三角洲前缘的沉积特征^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(3): 509-524.
[2]	贾润幸, 方维萱. 塔里木盆地西南部下白垩统克孜勒苏群沉积特征与成矿成藏作用^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(5): 1017-1028.
[3]	张可, 吴胜和, 许允杰, 熊绮聪, 高子杰, 余季陶. 湖盆扇三角洲河口坝发育程度及粒度韵律特征:以滦平盆地桑园剖面下白垩统西瓜园组为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(3): 415-432.
[4]	周勇, 纪友亮, 蒙启安, 万宏峰, 张革, 任钰涛, 严可欣, 梁涛, 陈富瑜, 强志成. 蒙古国塔木察格盆地塔南凹陷早白垩世构造古地貌控砂机制^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(3): 493-511.
[5]	余烨, 王莉, 尹太举, 张兴强, 黄俨然, 曹涛涛. 下刚果盆地早白垩世巴雷姆晚期深水重力流沉积的发现及意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(4): 620-634.
[6]	胡俊杰, 马寅生, 吴祎, 王宗秀, 柳永清, 高万里, 李宗星, 魏小洁. 柴达木盆地旺尕秀地区上侏罗统—下白垩统风成砂的发现及其意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(5): 776-786.
[7]	陈浩, 黄继新, 常广发, 武军昌, 孙天建. 基于全岩心CT的遗迹化石识别及沉积环境分析:以加拿大麦凯Ⅲ油砂区块为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(4): 703-712.
[8]	王帅, 邵龙义, 孙钦平, 张云鹤, 史鸣剑, 孙斌, 鲁静. 内蒙古二连盆地巴彦宝力格煤田下白垩统赛汉塔拉组层序—古地理与聚煤作用^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(2): 325-336.
[9]	郑荣才, 文华国, 李云, 常海亮. 甘肃酒西盆地青西凹陷下白垩统下沟组湖相喷流岩物质组分与结构构造^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(1): 1-18.
[10]	周瑶琪, 周腾飞, 张振凯, 梁钊, 梁文栋, 王安东, 于姗姗. 山东省灵山岛下白垩统青山群火山地震软沉积物变形构造特征及成因机制^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(4): 567-582.
[11]	冯增昭, 鲍志东, 郑秀娟, 王媛. 中国软沉积物变形构造及地震岩研究简评^①[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(1): 7-12.
[12]	钟建华, 倪良田, 邵珠福, 李勇, 刘选, 毛毳, 刘圣鑫, 孙宁亮, 陈彬, 王凯, 罗可, 王韶洁, 刘闯, 刘宝, 熊志强. 青岛灵山岛下白垩统风暴岩与风暴沉积的发现及意义^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2016, 18(3): 381-398.
[13]	李强,张革,孙效东,吴根耀,刘赫,李春柏,王金奎,刘绍军,高庚,朱德丰. 蒙古国塔木察格盆地塔南凹陷下白垩统铜钵庙组沉积特征和构造-古地理意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2014, 16(6): 897-906.
[14]	郭彪, 邵龙义, 张强, 马施民, 王东东, 周倩羽. 内蒙古海拉尔盆地早白垩世含煤岩系层序地层与聚煤规律[J]. 古地理学报, 2014, 16(5): 631-640.
[15]	王安东, 周瑶琪, 闫华, 王瑞, 张振凯, 王子阳. 山东省灵山岛早白垩世软沉积物变形构造特征*[J]. 古地理学报, 2013, 15(5): 717-728.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

山东灵山岛北背来石剖面下白垩统顺层砂脉的特征及其成因动力学分析*

Characteristics and dynamics origin of the Lower Cretaceous sill in northern Beilaishi section of Lingshan Island, Shandong Province

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

山东灵山岛北背来石剖面下白垩统顺层砂脉的特征及其成因动力学分析^*