中国贵州中生代四足类足迹化石的回顾与新发现<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>

doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2021.05.054

古地理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 873-886. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2021.05.054

• 生物古地理学及古生态学 • 下一篇

中国贵州中生代四足类足迹化石的回顾与新发现^*

邢立达^1,2, 曾嵘³, 张羽¹, 邱亮¹, 佟柏霖¹, 王董浩¹

1 中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院,北京 100083;
2 生物地质与环境地质国家重点实验室,中国地质大学(北京),北京 100083;
3 贵州省博物馆,贵州贵阳 550081

收稿日期:2021-04-22 修回日期:2021-06-09 出版日期:2021-10-01 发布日期:2021-09-29
作者简介:邢立达,男,1982年生,博士,中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院副教授,主要从事古脊椎动物学的教学与科研工作。E-mail: xinglida@cugb.edu.cn。
基金资助:
*国家自然科学基金基础科学中心项目(编号: 41888101)、国家自然科学基金重大项目(编号: 41790455)、国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号: 41772008)联合资助

Review and new discovery of the Mesozoic tetrapod footprints in Guizhou Province, China

Xing Li-Da^1,2, Zeng Rong³, Zhang Yu¹, Qiu Liang¹, Tong Bo-Lin¹, Wang Dong-Hao¹

1 School of Earth Sciences and Resources,China University of Geosciences(Beijing),Beijing 100083,China;
2 State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology,China University of Geosciences(Beijing),Beijing 100083,China;
3 Guizhou Provincial Museum,Guiyang 550081,China

Received:2021-04-22 Revised:2021-06-09 Online:2021-10-01 Published:2021-09-29
About author:Xing Li-Da,born in 1982,is an associate professor in School of Earth Sciences and Resources,China University of Geosciences(Beijing). He is mainly engaged in teaching and scientific research of paleovertebrates. E-mail: xinglida@cugb.edu.cn.
Supported by:
Co-funded by the Basic science center project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41888101),major project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41790455),general project of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.41772008)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 贵州省拥有丰富的中生代脊椎动物化石记录,多为三叠纪海生爬行类化石,侏罗纪和白垩纪的脊椎动物化石较少。目前,贵州省已发现中生代爬行类足迹点9处,分别为贞丰牛场、贞丰龙场、安顺幺铺、赫章辅处、毕节响水(2处)、仁怀茅台、赤水宝源和习水同民足迹点。文中除描述了贞丰龙场新增的一批足迹化石外,整理并总结了所有足迹点的发现史、研究现状、足迹类型与特征以及所反映的古生态信息。已发现的遗迹记录由69条行迹和420个孤立足迹组成,足迹总数达991个。所有的遗迹化石指示了至少477个造迹者,包括海生爬行类、手兽足迹类、非鸟兽脚类、鸟类、蜥脚类和鸟臀类等,其中三叠纪以海生爬行类主导,侏罗纪和白垩纪以蜥臀类主导。这个数据集为贵州中生代古生物类群的多样性提供了重要的信息,是晚中生代稀缺骨骼化石记录的良好补充,为研究贵州省中生代脊椎动物群的古生态与古环境提供了更多的证据。

关键词: 贵州, 三叠纪, 侏罗纪, 白垩纪, 足迹化石, 古生态学, 多样性

Abstract: Guizhou Province is rich in records of Mesozoic vertebrate fossils,mostly Triassic marine reptile fossils,while Jurassic and Cretaceous vertebrate fossils are scarce. There are nine Mesozoic tetrapod track sites discovered in Guizhou Province,which are Niuchang and Longchang sites from Zhenfeng,Yaopu site from Anshun,Fuchu site from Hezhang,Xiangshui sites I and II from Bijie,Maotai site from Renhuai,Baoyuan site from Chishui and Tongmin site from Xishui. This paper described more tracks of Longchang site from Zenfeng,and try to summarize the discovery and research history,track types and their characteristics,and the palaeoecological information reflected in all nine track sites. All these records consist of 69 trackways and 420 isolated tracks for a total of 991 tracks of tetrapod remains indicative of at least 477 trackmakers,including marine reptiles,chirotheriids,non-avian theropods,birds,sauropods,and ornithischian dinosaurs. Among them,the Triassic track records are dominated by marine reptiles,while the Jurassic and Cretaceous records show the dominance of saurischian. This dataset is an important supplement to the scarce bone fossils of the Late Mesozoic that contributed to the diversity of Mesozoic paleontological taxa in Guizhou Province,and provides more evidence for understanding the palaeoecology and palaeoenvironment of the Mesozoic vertebrate fauna of Guizhou Province.

Key words: Guizhou, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, dinosaur tracks, palaeoecology, diversity

中图分类号:

Q915.2+2

邢立达, 曾嵘, 张羽, 邱亮, 佟柏霖, 王董浩. 中国贵州中生代四足类足迹化石的回顾与新发现^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(5): 873-886.

Xing Li-Da, Zeng Rong, Zhang Yu, Qiu Liang, Tong Bo-Lin, Wang Dong-Hao. Review and new discovery of the Mesozoic tetrapod footprints in Guizhou Province, China[J]. JOPC, 2021, 23(5): 873-886.

http://www.gdlxb.cn/CN/Y2021/V23/I5/873

参考文献

[1] 贵州省地质矿产局. 1987. 贵州省区域地质志. 北京: 地质出版社,285-287.
[Guizhou Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. 1987. Regional Geology of Guizhou Province. Beijing: Geological Publishing House,285-287]
[2] 吕洪波,章雨旭,肖加飞. 2004. 贵州贞丰中三叠统关岭组中Chirotherium: 原始爬行类足迹研究. 地质学报, 78(4): 468-474,579.
[Lü H B,Zhang Y X,Xiao J F. 2004. Chirotherium: fossil footprints of primitive reptiles in the Middle Triassic Guanling Formation,Zhenfeng,Guizhou Province,China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 78(4): 468-474,579]
[3] 四川省地质矿产局. 1997. 全国地层多重划分对比研究·四川省岩石地层. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社,1-417.
[Sichuan Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. 1997. The petrostratigraphy of Sichuan Province is studied by multi-stratigraphic division and comparison. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press,1-417]
[4] 汪啸风,陈孝红,陈立德,徐光洪,王传尚,程龙. 2003. 关岭生物群: 世界上罕见的化石库. 中国地质, 30(1): 20-35.
[Wang X F,Chen X H,Chen L D,Xu G H,Wang C S,Cheng L. 2003. Guanling biota: rare fossil bank in the world. Geology in China, 30(1): 20-35]
[5] 王雪华,马骥. 1989. 贵州贞丰发现中三叠世早期恐龙遗迹. 中国区域地质,8(2): 186-189.
[Wang X H,Ma J. 1989. Early Middle Triassic dinosaur traces discovered in Zhenfeng,Guizhou. Regional geology of China,8(2): 186-189]
[6] 邢立达. 2016. 中国西南早白垩世恐龙及其他四足类足迹. 中国地质大学(北京)博士论文.
[Xing L D. 2016. Early Cretaceous dinosaur and other tetrapod tracks of southwestern China. Doctoral dissertation of China University of Geosciences(Beijing)]
[7] 曾嵘. 2020. 贵州中生代爬行类足迹化石综述. 贵州省博物馆(编). 贵博论丛. 广西桂林: 广西师范大学出版社,55-71.
[Zeng R. 2020. A review of Mesozoic reptile footprint fossils from Guizhou Province. In: Guizhou Provincial Museum(ed). Essays on Guizhou Provincial Museum. Guangxi Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press,55-71]
[8] 张晓诗,赵兵,谭梅,周冰洋,孙剑. 2016. 贵州大方侏罗统自流井组地层特征及恐龙足迹化石的发现. 贵州地质, 33(1): 50-57,70.
[Zhang X S,Zhao B,Tan M,Zhou B Y,Sun J. 2016. Stratigraphic characteristics of Ziliujing Formation,Jurassic Series and discovery of dinosaur footprints in Dafang,Guizhou. Guizhou Geology, 33(1): 50-57,70]
[9] Farlow J O,Schachner E R,Sarrazin J C,Klein H K,Currie P J. 2014. Pedal proportions of Poposaurus gracilis: convergence and divergence in the feet of archosaurs. the Anatomical Record, 297: 1022-1046.
[10] Haubold H,Klein H. 2000. Die dinosauroiden Fährten Parachirotherium-Atreipus-Grallator aus dem unteren Mittelkeuper(Obere Trias: Ladin,Karn,?Nor)in Franken. Hallesches Jahrbuch für Geowissenschaften,B22: 59-85.
[11] Klein H,Lucas S G. 2010. Tetrapod footprints: their use in biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Triassic. Geological Society London Special Publications, 334(1): 419-446.
[12] Klein H,Lucas S G. 2018. Diverse Middle Triassic tetrapod footprint assemblage from the Muschelkalk of Germany. Ichnos, 25(2-3): 162-176.
[13] Klein H,Lucas S G. 2021. The Triassic tetrapod footprint record. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 83: 1-194.
[14] Klein H,Heckert A B, Celeskey M. in press: Chirotheres: tracking the ancestors of dinosaurs and crocodiles. Indiana University Press,Bloomington,Indiana
[15] Lockley M G,Matsukawa M. 2009. A review of vertebrate track distributions in east and southeast Asia. Journal Paleontological Society of Korea, 25(1): 17-42.
[16] Xing L D,Klein H. 2021. Chirotherium and first Asian Rhynchosauroides tetrapod trackways from the Middle Triassic. Historical Biology, 33(6): 783-790.
[17] Xing L D,Harris J D,Gierliński G D,Wang W M,Wang Z Y,Li D Q. 2011. Middle Cretaceous non-avian theropod trackways from the southern margin of the Sichuan Basin,China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 50(4): 470-480.
[18] Xing L D,Klein H,Lockley M G,Li J J,Matsukawa M,Xiao J F. 2013. Chirotherium trackways from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou,China. Ichnos, 20: 99-107.
[19] Xing L D,Klein H,Lockley M G,Kan Z Z,Zhang J P,Peng G Z,Ye Y. 2014. First chirothere and possible grallatorid footprint assemblage from the Upper Triassic Baoding Formation of Sichuan Province,southwestern China. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, 412: 169-176.
[20] Xing L D,Lockley M G,Zhang J P,Klein H,Marty D,Peng G Z,Ye Y,McCrea R T,Persons W S Ⅳ,Xu T. 2015. The longest theropod trackway from East Asia,and a diverse sauropod-,theropod-,and ornithopod-track assemblage from the Lower Cretaceous Jiaguan Formation,southwest China. Cretaceous Research, 56: 345-362.
[21] Xing L D,Lockley M G,Zhang J P,Klein H,Li D Q,Miyashita T,Li Z D,Kümmell S B. 2016. A new sauropodomorph ichnogenus from the Lower Jurassic of Sichuan,China fills a gap in the track record. Historical Biology, 28(7): 881-895.
[22] Xing L D,Lockley M G,Klein H,Zeng R,Cai S F,Luo X C,Li C. 2018. Theropod assemblages and a new ichnotaxon Gigandipus chiappei ichnosp. nov. from the Jiaguan Formation,Lower Cretaceous of Guizhou Province,China. Geoscience Frontiers, 9(6): 1745-1754.
[23] Xing L D,Lockley M G,Zhang L Z,Klein H,Zheng Y W,Peng G Z,Jiang S,Dai L,Burns M E. 2019a. First Jurassic dinosaur tracksite from Guizhou Province,China: morphology,trackmaker and paleoecology. Historical Biology, 31(10): 1423-1432.
[24] Xing L D,Lockley M G,Tang D J,Klein H,Peng G Z,Ye Y,Hao B Q. 2019b. Early Jurassic basal sauropodomorpha dominated tracks from Guizhou,China: morphology,ethology,and paleoenvironment. Geoscience Frontiers, 10(1): 229-240.
[25] Xing L D,Klein H,Lockley M G,Wu X C,Benton M J,Zeng R,Romilio A. 2020. Footprints of marine reptiles from the Middle Triassic(Anisian-Ladinian)Guanling Formation of Guizhou Province,southwestern China: the earliest evidence of synchronous swimming. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, 558: 109943.
[26] Xing L D,Lockley M G,Klein H,Zeng R,Peng G Z,Ye Y,Hao B Q,Persons W S Ⅳ. 2021. A theropod and sauropod track assemblage from the Lower Jurassic of Guizhou,China. Historical Biology, 33(9): 1556-1564.
[27] Yin Z J,Cunningham J A,Vargas K,Bengtson S,Zhu M Y,Donoghue P C J. 2017. Nuclei and nucleoli in embryo-like fossils from the Ediacaran Weng'an Biota. Precambrian Research, 301: 145-151.
[28] Zhang Q Y,Wen W,Hu S X,Benton M J,Zhou C Y,Xie T,Lü T,Huang J Y,Choo B,Chen Z Q,Liu J,Zhang Q C. 2014. Nothosaur foraging tracks from the Middle Triassic of southwestern China. Nature Communications, 5: 3973.
[29] Zhao Y L,Zhu M Y,Babcock L E,Yuan J L,Parsley R L,Peng J,Yang X L,Wang Y. 2005. Kaili Biota: a Taphonomic window on diversification of metazoans from the basal Middle Cambrian: Guizhou,China. Acta Geologica Sinica(English Edition), 79(6): 751-765.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

中国贵州中生代四足类足迹化石的回顾与新发现^*

Review and new discovery of the Mesozoic tetrapod footprints in Guizhou Province, China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邓旭升, 熊兴国, 王文明, 张德明, 李月森, 周武, 赵磊, 龚桂源, 李治海. 贵州习水地区早二叠世古地理和古地貌及其对锂资源的控制作用^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(2): 368-382.
[2]	高川黔, 杨瑞东, 高军波, 彭柔, 李晓伟, 陈军, 陈吉艳. 贵州瓮安陡山沱期球粒状磷块岩的生物成磷作用探讨^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(2): 395-410.
[3]	郑伟, 和俊淼, 邢智峰, 李妲, 齐永安, 万恩召, 张湘赟. 豫西地区早二叠世—早三叠世植物群演化及其古气候变化^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(2): 468-483.
[4]	陈兰, 达雪娟, 朱章雄, 徐桂文, 毛伟丞, 黄文科, 夏芳, 杨佩琳, 骆宇晗, 廖显娇. 托阿尔期大洋缺氧事件在中国陆相地层的碳循环扰动响应^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2025, 27(2): 528-540.
[5]	曲天泉, 李素萍, 刘惟庆, 陈璐琦. 基于孢粉数据的白垩纪中国东部地貌解读^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2024, 26(2): 354-372.
[6]	李罡. 燕辽生物群叶肢介动物群组成和演化^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(2): 368-381.
[7]	张小乐, 王怿, 刘建波, 黄璞, 徐洪河. 扬子板块西北缘下泥盆统平驿铺组双壳类遗迹化石^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(2): 392-404.
[8]	许欣, 邢智峰, 郑伟, 齐永安, 李婉颖, 吴盼盼, 张湘赟, 万恩召, 和俊淼, 李妲. 豫西济源地区中下三叠统遗迹网络分析^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(2): 419-430.
[9]	李高榕, 魏凡, 丛培允. 华南埃迪卡拉纪—寒武纪宏体藻类化石的时空分布与多样性变化^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(2): 451-470.
[10]	王雪莲, 熊聪慧, 孙柏年. 甘肃永昌乌拉尔世Sphenopteris(楔羊齿)新记录: 兼论晚古生代Sphenopteris多样性及古地理演化^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2023, 25(2): 471-484.
[11]	李昌昊, 葛禹, 金鑫, 时志强. 鄂尔多斯盆地早侏罗世富县期沉积演化: 大洋缺氧事件前后陆地气候变化的响应^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2022, 24(4): 697-712.
[12]	高志勇, 石雨昕, 冯佳睿, 周川闽. 砾石在分析盆地物源区迁移与湖岸线演化中的作用^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(3): 507-524.
[13]	邓珍珍, 熊聪慧, 黄璞, 薛进庄. 中国晚泥盆世至早三叠世楔叶类植物多样性研究^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(3): 565-580.
[14]	周小梅, 金鑫, 吴强旺, 葛禹, 时志强. 鱼粪化石特征对早侏罗世托阿尔期湖泊生态系统的启示:以川东大安寨段为例^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2021, 23(3): 600-609.
[15]	邓旭升, 杜远生, 余文超, 吴开彬, 卢树藩, 张晗彬. “黔中隆起”和贵州晚古生代古地理演化及其对铝土矿的控矿作用^*[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(5): 872-892.

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

中国贵州中生代四足类足迹化石的回顾与新发现*

Review and new discovery of the Mesozoic tetrapod footprints in Guizhou Province, China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

中国贵州中生代四足类足迹化石的回顾与新发现^*